Hi
@jes_ON, thanks for your reply.
I'm a musician and have one of those complicated matters of receiving as self-employed but actually being an employee. I completely understand that self-employed (inland) is not eligible under express entry, but I also understand that intricate matters like mine are decided on a case-by-case by the Officer. This responds why I do not have T4s, and no payslips.
No, actually it does not explain it. If you were self-employed, you should have been issued a T4A, as well as have a record of payments. (As well, you should be submitting invoices). The only time you would have no documentary evidence is if you were working under the table.
This also explain why using the word "average", since 75% of my work is done on my own time, with the rest of it being at the employer's place and time.
No, "average" is a mathematical term indicating the mean number of hours for which you were paid (regardless of where the work was performed). If you're suggesting your employer is just "guessing" - that's another matter. As for the work being done on your own time, this is an argument against your being in an employer-employee relationship.
I did file my return and I'm planning on sending my NOA, and my Schedule C which will show my Gross income before deductions (while NOA will only show Net income). I'm also attaching a statement from the employer which shoes the payments made to me up to date. What is your opinion on this, as far as proof of income goes?
I think it's great proof that you were self-employed.
If changing my application to 16 hours does not represent an issue, than I think I should just change to make it consistent, right? -
If it does not affect your eligibility, and you cannot submit proof that you worked 20 hours per week, then you should correct your application.
two years ago, in a letter to support a work permit to my wife they have claimed 20 hours and the wording for this was "while he is responsible for managing his own time, we estimate that the job entails him spending up to 20 hours a week". Should I attach this letter as well? Or should I just change my application to 16 hours, and send the letter stating 16 hs, being consistent in both ends?
I would not submit a letter that introduces more contradictory evidence. Nonetheless, the VO would have access to this letter already, if they wanted to look.
Look, obviously I do not know the fine details of your situation or how you plan to make the argument about being in an employer-employee relationship, but I think THAT is your biggest problem (Not the hours worked per week). Based on what you've described so far, I would not expect it to go your way.
Even worse, the law (and the CRA) is starting to catch up and label those "intricate" situations like yours as a "dependent contractors" and earning that label would bring both you and your employer a world of (financial) hurt.
I hope you have a plan B... Perhaps your wife can be the principal applicant (eventually)?