Your explanation makes perfect sense. I wanted to reflect back to you how it might appear to someone who did not know the details. The way I read it, it was possible to think you had $7,000 in a UK account then moved $4,000 to an account in another country to make the $11,000. That was why I thought the two statements should prove they contained consistent funding. I don't think there should be concern about the fact the money is in two countries, rather that using a statement "within the last 6 months" does not prove that money is still there. I would have the same questions in my mind if the accounts were both in the UK. I hope this helps.