Looks good. But is there enough space for writing all this? If yes, go ahead!Maherd said:I think I would rather mention it like this
1.) Applied in 2002
File no. - ****
Purpose - PR
As a dependent
Result : Refused
2.) Applied in 2008
File no. - ****
Purpose - PR
As a dependant
Result : Refunded
With the file no. they can all the relevant details.Rather than explaining what the situation was and what went wrong. What do you say ?