+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

PR Rejection

Kiranmayi

Hero Member
Jul 18, 2013
923
40
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC Ottawa
NOC Code......
2174
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
22-09-2014
Doc's Request.
N/A
Nomination.....
N/A
AOR Received.
02-02-2015
IELTS Request
Send with Application
Med's Done....
15-12-2015 (upfront)
Passport Req..
29-02-2016
VISA ISSUED...
10-03-2016
LANDED..........
16-03-2016
JPMH_CEC_2013 said:
This is the first time I heard an application being rejected based on the company's profile. This is very strange reason.
It will be nice if you can copy the rejection letter here....
Sure. I am trying to get that information. :)
 

nicole1006

Hero Member
Feb 7, 2013
367
5
Category........
Visa Office......
Ottawa
NOC Code......
Noc 1241
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
11-08-2012
AOR Received.
06-09-2012
That means visa officer and do.u.know when.did.she apply it?
 

CEC2013

Hero Member
Dec 8, 2012
866
48
Category........
Visa Office......
CPP-O
NOC Code......
1122
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04 FEB 2013
Doc's Request.
26 NOV 2013 (RPRF)
AOR Received.
14 MAR 2013
IELTS Request
Sent with application.
Med's Request
27 NOV 2013
Med's Done....
29 NOV 2013
Interview........
Waived.
Passport Req..
09 DEC 2013
VISA ISSUED...
19 DEC 2013
LANDED..........
21 DEC 2013
JPMH_CEC_2013 said:
This is the first time I heard an application being rejected based on the company's profile. This is very strange reason.
It will be nice if you can copy the rejection letter here....
Its certainly uncommon...but not unlikely. If CIC is unable to verify information you provided, then they will obviously red flag and in some cases, like here, reject. Of course not every company can afford a website and whatnot, but if you are providing bogus or non-existent contact info....well, its pretty clear what is to ensue. Put yourself in the VO's shoes. You come across some company that has no verifiable information, no working contacts...and on top, you would have to dig for information (business licenses, etc). They wont do that. Its on you to prove its legitimate.

However, I would consider this an extreme. I wonder what the VO explanation looked like.