Are you seriously suggesting that in Canada it is possible for a petitioner to obtain a divorce lawfully without the Respondent receiving any notice of the proceedings? Without being given any opportunity to defend the divorce proceedings if he so wishes? Consent to the proceedings is of course unnecessary, but absence of notice, particularly where the Petitioner knows where the Respondent lives (she wrote to him), usually entails fraud. Usually diivorce proceedings have to be served either in person or by post or a court order for substituted service, such as by advertisement, has to be obtained; and those orders are not usually made unless the court has been told that the whereabouts of the Respondent are unknown. If the court was so told despite the wife's knowledge of his whereabouts, there was probably fraud. Of course things may be different in Canada! I am not in Canada and am not a Canadian lawyer. Anyway are you not jumping the gun? We do not know for certain whether he was married, let alone divorced; but if he was divorced without his knowledge that would be a very unusual state of affairs in respect of which he would, to answer Truesmile's point, need legal advice. On the basis of the facts as at present known there are no grounds for asserting that if there was a divorce it would be completely legal in Canada. If he was once married and is not lawfully divorced, an assertion of bigamy as a means of getting her back to the Philippines is a possibility that springs to mind. How to bring her back is what he was asking about As for Truesmile's point about money, of course he wants money: he has the burden of caring for their children and receives no contribution from their mother. Wny is an attempt to get her to contribute not a laudable motive? I am astonished how little sympathy the man has received in this thread.
[/Can you please advise me what to do?]