- Apr 11, 2014
- 1
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- mississauga
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 16-03-2016
- AOR Received.
- 04-05-2016
- Med's Request
- 25-03-2017
- Med's Done....
- 31-03-2017
I heard some cases were rejected as 'for the convenience of marriage', especially when the applicant is an international student and the permit is expiring/expired. Our case is under sponsoring common-law partner. I summarize some of our backgrounds as below, any suggestions would be appreciated!
In 2009, my partner and I knew each other and began dating. He flew every summer/winter vacation to visit me in my home country.
In 2011, I applied student visa and came to Canada as we decided to get together, not separated anymore. Since then, we have been living together till now(more than 3 years). I attended school for a one-year post graduate program and graduated in 2012.
In 2012, I got one year post-graduate work permit (as the length of the program) and somehow didn't find a job successfully due to the length constraint of the work permit.
In 2013, the work permit expired. To maintain the legal status, in 2014 I applied for another program and extended my student permit to 2016 but not attending school anymore.
My partner would like to sponsor me under common-law category. But for the concern as I mentioned in the beginning, is there any red flag raised for VO reviewing my case? Does my case give VO the feeling of the immigration purpose since considering my current situation?
There are some stories in our relationship. My partner was planning to sponsor me two years ago, but something unpleasant happened between us and we are rebuilding our relationship little by little. Can I mention this when narrating our development story? Would there be a negative impression of our unstable relationship given to the VO? If I'm not doing so, I think the VO would have some doubt why to this stage, is the application designated.
I really would have someone to review and analyze our case as the outsider, give me some heads up and suggestions. Thanks!!
In 2009, my partner and I knew each other and began dating. He flew every summer/winter vacation to visit me in my home country.
In 2011, I applied student visa and came to Canada as we decided to get together, not separated anymore. Since then, we have been living together till now(more than 3 years). I attended school for a one-year post graduate program and graduated in 2012.
In 2012, I got one year post-graduate work permit (as the length of the program) and somehow didn't find a job successfully due to the length constraint of the work permit.
In 2013, the work permit expired. To maintain the legal status, in 2014 I applied for another program and extended my student permit to 2016 but not attending school anymore.
My partner would like to sponsor me under common-law category. But for the concern as I mentioned in the beginning, is there any red flag raised for VO reviewing my case? Does my case give VO the feeling of the immigration purpose since considering my current situation?
There are some stories in our relationship. My partner was planning to sponsor me two years ago, but something unpleasant happened between us and we are rebuilding our relationship little by little. Can I mention this when narrating our development story? Would there be a negative impression of our unstable relationship given to the VO? If I'm not doing so, I think the VO would have some doubt why to this stage, is the application designated.
I really would have someone to review and analyze our case as the outsider, give me some heads up and suggestions. Thanks!!