CEC2013
Hero Member
- Dec 8, 2012
- 866
- 48
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- CPP-O
- NOC Code......
- 1122
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 04 FEB 2013
- Doc's Request.
- 26 NOV 2013 (RPRF)
- AOR Received.
- 14 MAR 2013
- IELTS Request
- Sent with application.
- Med's Request
- 27 NOV 2013
- Med's Done....
- 29 NOV 2013
- Interview........
- Waived.
- Passport Req..
- 09 DEC 2013
- VISA ISSUED...
- 19 DEC 2013
- LANDED..........
- 21 DEC 2013
Caribou said:I'll consult that with **spam** to see if it's better for my manager to include just job duty and sign it. As far as my case goes, the department doesn't really have access to company letter head and I think it might be more suspicious if I do not use company letter head. (It's a really well known top 100 Canadian company) for any verification issues, it needs to go through bookkeeper at local level then to headquarter. Like I said before. I hate this beauroucracy
My public service hat on ... and mind you, just trying to help - not dispute ... if you included pay stubs with company logo and info, but then included an employment letter thats not on company letterhead, it would be a flag for me. It raises the issue of consistency. You said you dont have access to company letterhead. Do they have any previous documents on letterhead available which your super/manager could use to just put in what you need? If it needs to be like this, with the diference in documents, then I would definitely explain the reasons. Just thinking out loud.