@wksj , did you receive report on their plan for 2022-23 online citizenship applications?
“We are in the process of completing the review of records responsive to this request. I am hoping to have a response to you by the second week of September.”

@wksj , did you receive report on their plan for 2022-23 online citizenship applications?
“We are in the process of completing the review of records responsive to this request. I am hoping to have a response to you by the second week of September.”![]()
I was thinking to do the same end of Aug, but I guess hearing about your case I should just wait for Online to move ahead.I have accepted my fate, I sent paper application in June after online application which was in February, no response and all still in in progress..my suggestion, if you apply online don't bother sending in paper application, makes no difference right now
You submitted your application in February 2022, it's still "early" for an online applicant to hear back. But yeah it seems that they ignored your paper application altogether.Gcms came out today, everything is not started, paper application is not on gcms notes, meaning my paper was ignored and only online application is valid, also all the due dates have passed and my secondary processing office is updated to Scarborough...well I am just tired at this point
Well well, so much for the failed tactics to overburden IRCC. I warned people against this, but most got real irate at me.Gcms came out today, everything is not started, paper application is not on gcms notes, meaning my paper was ignored and only online application is valid, also all the due dates have passed and my secondary processing office is updated to Scarborough...well I am just tired at this point
Gcms came out today, everything is not started, paper application is not on gcms notes, meaning my paper was ignored and only online application is valid, also all the due dates have passed and my secondary processing office is updated to Scarborough...well I am just tired at this point
Well well, so much for the failed tactics to overburden IRCC. I warned people against this, but most got real irate at me.
Unfortunately, just good intentions don't help. Yes, no one was going to send stuff to them with the intention of overburdening IRCC. So you're right, people had good intentions of wanting their applications processed expeditiously. However, there was a very slim chance of this working given that you are connected with both your online and paper application with one single UCI and any duplication of applications would've resulted in the latest one being discarded. Now, what you did was wasted an agent's time by having them scan in your paper application only for them to later realize that it's a dupe. Your good intentions are irrelevant because you ended up overburdening IRCC anyway.Don't be thick, nobody was trying to "overburden" IRCC, people are just trying to have their applications fairly processed. IRCC is not a victim here.
However, there was a very slim chance of this working given that you are connected with both your online and paper application with one single UCI and any duplication of applications would've resulted in the latest one being discarded
..... Now, what you did was wasted an agent's time by having them scan in your paper application only for them to later realize that it's a dupe. Your good intentions are irrelevant because you ended up overburdening IRCC anyway....
Don't be thick, nobody was trying to "overburden" IRCC, people are just trying to have their applications fairly processed. IRCC is not a victim here.
I would not even encourage any individual to withdraw their application, that may even take longer that getting approvedUnfortunately, just good intentions don't help. Yes, no one was going to send stuff to them with the intention of overburdening IRCC. So you're right, people had good intentions of wanting their applications processed expeditiously. However, there was a very slim chance of this working given that you are connected with both your online and paper application with one single UCI and any duplication of applications would've resulted in the latest one being discarded. Now, what you did was wasted an agent's time by having them scan in your paper application only for them to later realize that it's a dupe. Your good intentions are irrelevant because you ended up overburdening IRCC anyway.
BTW the way to do this right would've been to withdraw the online application, wait for the confirmation, and then send in the paper application.
Well as long as none of us works for IRCC, it is what it is, who knows maybe my file has started movingFinally, someone uttered similar words that I did sometime in the past. This is what I didn't want - to waste IRCC's time. Here's my original post in case you missed it or care to read. I'm a terrible writer and people interpreted that as rude, but well, my true intentions were fair.
I am not on IRCC's side, and when I stated (actually implored in the forum) not to send in duplicate paper applications and waste IRCC's resources, what I really meant was not to delay everybody's application. A five minute wasted by IRCC in tossing off duplicates, is five minutes of delay in processing of applications as a whole. Somehow, only few people seemed to understand this. I'm on your side fellas.