Hearty Congratulations, you had submitted your application a month earlier than me.rq2012-Mississauga said:All
I have been a silent viewer of the forum.
Just wanted to update everyone of my timeline.
Application Submitted-----Jan 2012
Local Office----------Mississauga
Start of processing--------Sept 2012
Pre-Test RQ----------------Sept 2012
RQ submitted--------------Oct 2012
File transferred to St Clair-----April 2013
Citizenship Test---------- 24th Sept 2014 St Clair
Oath Date------------Dec 4th 2014 at Mississauga.
Thank you everybody for your insights and opinions and Good Luck to you all.
Hopefully in coming days / weeks senior members of this forum, such as you, Moe and others would get the Oath letters. I wish & pray 4 all.janoo said:Congratulation... my application and your application is almost at same date..
my file transfer to St.Clair in March 2013 and submitted my RQ April 2013.
hope and prey my journey to be finish asap.
I'm sharing this forum reader Fernendez's post from Nov 10th, though it does not give much details beyond what is fpat.Nyork said:Hello folks,
Have anyone in the forum required an fpat and received oath invitation?
I was wondering how long could it take if an fpat is required
Please help!!
Canadiandesi2006 said:I'm sharing this forum reader Fernendez's post from Nov 10th, though it does not give much details beyond what is fpat.
Quote : FPAT = File Preparation Analysis Template. It is a form filled out by a citizenship officer after reviewing your file and before referring it to a citizenship judge.
Here is URL for other immigration forum too, you may consider putting this query there too. Hope you get some details on this.
https://secure.immigration.ca/forum/search_results_posts.asp?SearchID=20141117193738&KW=Oath
Hope this helps. Wish you all the best.
[Thank you Canadiandesi. I will look into it today. Do u think it will take a few more year to finalize my file? I read a lot what does fpat mean but i have never bumped into anyone who knows how long does it take for a decision to be taken ]
Hi NyorkNyork said:Hello folks,
Have anyone in the forum required an fpat and received oath invitation?
I was wondering how long could it take if an fpat is required
Please help!!
echorael said:Hi Nyork
Your FPAT started back in July! This is a very long time for them to do and finish the analysis and reach the decision. Have you thought about ordering the Physical file. It might shed some light on what's going on. As we know each case is different and its the applicant only who knows the details of his case and its complexity. You are a per-test rq applicant. Do you have many land trips to the States with no stamps? Where you a student before PR? All these questions have a direct impact on what you should expect. It may indicate as the call center told you that officer was not able to make a decision yet. Depending on why they issued the RQ in the first place this may indicate that a CJ hearing may be required. I hope not. But still a CJ hearing is not a bad thing because citizenship officers some times are not able to connect the events together to for the story. You will be more able to connect the events before the CJ and form your story of residency.This is my opinion of things and I might be wrong and totally incorrect. If you require to talk more you can send me a private msg. I hope you a good luck
[Thank you very much for the swift reply. I don't have any visits to the states neither i was on a student visa. I really lost any interest in having this citizenship anymore. I even don't care if i will have cj hearing. If they wish to grant me the citizenship, it will be great and if not i really don't care anymore. It took them toooooo long that we lost interest. Sorry for the negative attitude i have but i am really frustrated]
Nyork said:Thanks to reader who explained the FPAT process. Indeed, frustration is an understatement but bear in mind, we are not alone in this pit.echorael said:Hi Nyork
Your FPAT started back in July! This is a very long time for them to do and finish the analysis and reach the decision. Have you thought about ordering the Physical file. It might shed some light on what's going on. As we know each case is different and its the applicant only who knows the details of his case and its complexity. You are a per-test rq applicant. Do you have many land trips to the States with no stamps? Where you a student before PR? All these questions have a direct impact on what you should expect. It may indicate as the call center told you that officer was not able to make a decision yet. Depending on why they issued the RQ in the first place this may indicate that a CJ hearing may be required. I hope not. But still a CJ hearing is not a bad thing because citizenship officers some times are not able to connect the events together to for the story. You will be more able to connect the events before the CJ and form your story of residency.This is my opinion of things and I might be wrong and totally incorrect. If you require to talk more you can send me a private msg. I hope you a good luck
[Thank you very much for the swift reply. I don't have any visits to the states neither i was on a student visa. I really lost any interest in having this citizenship anymore. I even don't care if i will have cj hearing. If they wish to grant me the citizenship, it will be great and if not i really don't care anymore. It took them toooooo long that we lost interest. Sorry for the negative attitude i have but i am really frustrated]
This forum members are really very helpful, sharing & exchanging views that eases our pains.
On a brighter side, CIC has added 300 Officers with powers to decide cases. Let's hope processing will get lot faster early next year.
More ever new cases taking less than 6 months. So, be positive if due to any reason our files lands in problems, we can re-apply ;D
I'm not sure if the new laws requires 1460 days for all. I dont remember besides $100 increase in fees there were any major changes.echorael said:For us waiting from 2010,2011,2012 what will happen if we have to reapply? Are we going to apply under the new rules or old rules? I believe that CIC must take action either approve or deny all back log cases before the new rules come into effect. This is necessary to give those applicant to reapply under the current rule. If this is true then this back log must be finished before approximately July/2015. Otherwise, CIC will face many law cases claiming that due process were not given to the applicant files and long time processing resulted of additional problem to the applicants one of them is that they have to apply under the new rules. Some applicant will have the required 1460 days but some will not.