>>>>>>>NOVEMBER 2020 AOR<<<<<<< Join here
- Thread starter legalfalcon
- Start date
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/operational-bulletins-manuals/permanent-residence/express-entry/assessing-electronic-application-on-section-a11-2.html
Scrol down to “exemption to section A11.2”. Read it and then it’s upto you to continue searching for the answer.
GCMS Notes are exactly the same with you.
My last experience of calling to IRCC was exactly the same with you. I have tried to raise webform several times, but somehow fail to reach out. I have sent two emails to hongkong office, but only receive same bullshit.
Mine's also at Pretoria VO with the same status. Ordered a second set of notes, now I'm guessing there won't be any changes from the first set since they seem to not be clearing eligibility checks for FSWOs. They're too busy processing student/spousal/dependent applications...
- Sep 21, 2015
- 9,916
- Category........
- FSW
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- NOC Code......
- 4112
- App. Filed.......
- 03-09-2015
- Doc's Request.
- 01-10-2015
- AOR Received.
- 03-09-2015
- Med's Done....
- 17-08-2015
- Passport Req..
- 05-04-2016
- VISA ISSUED...
- 12-04-2016
- LANDED..........
- 05-05-2016
The application is locked on the date it is submitted. Any change to family composition doe does not change the CRS score. Points do not go down for adding a spouse if it is done post e-APR.
Changes to family composition
All family members must be examined as part of the e-APR, whether they are accompanying the principal applicant or not. Family members can be added to the application at any time during the process, including after the visa is issued, but prior to obtaining permanent resident status. Applicants are instructed to inform IRCC immediately if their family composition has changed (e.g., birth of a child, marriage, divorce).
Pursuant to subsection R4(1), the principal applicant may not include a spouse or common-law partner in their application if their relationship was entered into primarily to acquire any status or privilege under the Act or is not genuine. Similarly, in accordance with subsection R4(2), the principal applicant may not include an adopted child in their application if the adoption was entered into primarily to obtain any status or privilege under the Act or if it did not create a genuine parent–child relationship.
Section A11.2 does not apply when an applicant adds a family member to their application after the e-APR; however, the family member will have to be assessed, and the principal applicant must provide IRCC with the Additional Family Information form [IMM 5406 (PDF, 570KB)] and pay the applicable fees online.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/operational-bulletins-manuals/permanent-residence/express-entry/assessing-electronic-application-on-section-a11-2.html
That sounds really frustrating apollonoob. We managed to get a response to a generic webform, but no response to the Pretoria office webform. It’s difficult because it looks like some files are being processed and paused before finalisation, and others are only being processed up until a certain point.
I think I have come to accept that until such time as I see FSW-O PPRs being issued, there will be no further movement on our file.
It seems like the best is just order the notes, because even when there are responses to webforms they can be quite generic.
Thank you, yeah hopefully things will move fast once they start working on FSW-O applications again...
Yeah, I plan to order notes, again. Then I will share part of my notes in this thread
Hello, did someone tried to send webforms these days? it seems that they have some issues:
For Paris I received this: Failure sending mail.
IRCC message: The Web form isn’t working for some users. We’re looking into the issue and will fix it as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
For Paris I received this: Failure sending mail.
IRCC message: The Web form isn’t working for some users. We’re looking into the issue and will fix it as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
AOR 19th November - CEC Outland
Stages:
Medicals: Passed
Eligibility: In progress
Background check: In progress
Security: Not started
Biometrics - Completed as of January 2021
VO - Ottawa
Hi everyone. I just got off the phone with an agent and her tone makes me think something’s not right with my application. I was worried I used the wrong NOC 1311 instead of 1431. However, my tasks and duties were more senior than a 1431 role. She said it was “still open” which is what all the agents have said. When she mentioned eligibility she made an ughh sound so maybe I’m overthinking or maybe there’s something in my notes that suggests it’s not passed. I was told it was in review required a few months ago.
I’ve ordered gcms notes so I’m patiently waiting for them. It would be absolutely heartbreaking to have spent so much money, time and energy to have my application [redacted] at this stage. I can’t even type it lol… positive vibes only!
Anyone in the same predicament?
Thanks!
Stages:
Medicals: Passed
Eligibility: In progress
Background check: In progress
Security: Not started
Biometrics - Completed as of January 2021
VO - Ottawa
Hi everyone. I just got off the phone with an agent and her tone makes me think something’s not right with my application. I was worried I used the wrong NOC 1311 instead of 1431. However, my tasks and duties were more senior than a 1431 role. She said it was “still open” which is what all the agents have said. When she mentioned eligibility she made an ughh sound so maybe I’m overthinking or maybe there’s something in my notes that suggests it’s not passed. I was told it was in review required a few months ago.
I’ve ordered gcms notes so I’m patiently waiting for them. It would be absolutely heartbreaking to have spent so much money, time and energy to have my application [redacted] at this stage. I can’t even type it lol… positive vibes only!
Anyone in the same predicament?
Thanks!
@legalfalcon I have a question for you.
I saw your post online where there was this article saying that the back log has increased by 60%
Now my question is that
Can IRCC decide to Cancel all the back logged applications and go to default zero?
Your insight on this would be very useful.
Thank You
I saw your post online where there was this article saying that the back log has increased by 60%
Now my question is that
Can IRCC decide to Cancel all the back logged applications and go to default zero?
Your insight on this would be very useful.
Thank You
Ofcourse anything is possible.. but we do know they want to land high no of immigrants in the next two years.. to achieve that goal, its easier to finalise applications already in the last phase n nearing approvals rather than cancelling them all n start the process from scratch.. lets hope for the best.. fingers crossed
My case in hongkong office. Fail to send webform, manage to send email but receive useless response:
“Please be advised that your application is in queue for review. Our office will contact you with further instructions or a final decision once the Migration officer’s review is complete.
We trust that this information will be of assistance.”