Hello D,drajpoot said:Hello Shreya
There is nothing misconstrued and again I would say officer can never be particular for any thing without any specific reason the way you mentioned in the posts. I can never ignore any post here which may give another message or misleading information to people here. Most of the people including you used to read and write in this forum when they are tensed and I do not want them to tense more just because of some posts like officer are rigid and looking for some particular documents......etc cause these things make people more tensed.
AND the fact is NS officers are really cooperative unless your application is hiding the facts.
And as what you said I must have misunderstood from your post so there might be many who are reading this forum may misunderstood and I tried to clear out Do not take so personal.
Be clear and transparent.
I did not misrepresent and misinterpret anything so better be reasonable what you are writing specially on a online platform cause you might be questioned of what you are saying and thats why I raised a question on your post, did not conclude, represent or interpret anything.
So now again Can you please show me what and where i interpret or represent in your post? As I did not find anything other then my question over your post which is still not answered.
Looking forward your reply
regards
D
Firstly, please do not take me otherwise when I say that highlighting something and asking for evidences and justification is a form of accusation. Highlighting only a clause instead of the whole statement and drawing conclusions and presenting it in one's own interpreted form is misrepresentation because the fact is getting misconstrued. Hope this answers your question. Moreover my "request" to you can be regarded as extremely considerate in comparison to your online accusation.
Also, please note that people are not here to tell stories. The whole point of the forum is to discuss each member's problems, queries, concerns etc. to obtain possible resolutions to one's problems, thereby guiding others in mitigating similar issues. If you don't wish to help someone then at least please don't rag them in such turmoil.
Not everyone's experience is the same. Had everyone's experience been the same, then everyone would have obtained a nomination without any hindrances. But in reality that is not what is happening. Since you are an avid follower and a "Champion Member" of this forum, you must have come across quite a few cases which have been rejected for unconvincing reasons. Don't you think members of this forum get intimidated after reading their posts? What do you think is their reason for posting their cases?
One more thing, I don't think anyone who has applied has hidden / tried to hide any fact. Then how come you AGAIN accuse someone of hiding facts. This reminds me of a proverb that I learned in school, "Mole in a theif's beard". I hope that is not the case here, pun intended*. I think your application must have passed smoothly and you did not have to contact your nominee officer even once. That is possibly the reason of your biasness and cynicism.
I would also like to request you to rectify yourself when you refer to me. My name is Shreyashi Rangachari. I don't prefer everyone to call me Shreya.
Lastly please note that although I am not liable to answer to anyone but I am still doing so as a goodwill gesture. Please ignore my messages in future as they will not be intended to you. So you may now relax my friend.
Regards,
S.