Under the heading "Mobility Rights", the section reads,
“ 6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right
a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and
b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
(3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to
a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and
b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada."
That ought to do it.
Also, you say: "There are different classes of PRs ; provincial nominee, Federal Skilled Workers, Federal Skilled Trades , Canada Experience Class etc."
I don't have any documentation to support this, but the way I understand it, there are no such "classes" of PR. Once a Permanent Resident, you are a Permanent Resident and that is it (refugees might have a different kind of status, I don't know, although if they also become Permanent Resident, I would guess they are no longer refugees per se, but just Permanent Residents). What you are referring to are Express Entry Streams, different options to obtain Permanent Residency. Again, this is only my understanding of it.
Lastly, the wording you use such as "pledging alliance" is very strong and is making the whole thing sound a bit too dramatic. If the Canadian constitution protects its citizens' right to mobility, there probably is a good reason for it. As for judging a character based on whether he/she abides by his/her original promise to establish himself/herself in a given province, this isn't for us to judge. Personally, I can think of many legitimate reasons for a newly established PR to want to live in a different province than the one she/he had intended to live into originally. Economic reasons especially come to my mind (is it really beneficial to anyone to force an immigrant to live in a given province when the specific type of job that person is most suited for is in high demand in a different province and in very low demand in the province that person currently resides in? That's one possible scenario.)
It is a complicated issue no doubt, and this just isn't the place to generalize on it.
Besides, like I said, ideally, I want to reside in Ontario. I'm not misleading anyone as to my intentions. I don't believe I am.
This should do it :
Under the heading "Mobility Rights", the section reads,
“ 6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right
a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and
b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
(3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to
a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and
" (3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to
a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence;"
"any laws or practices of general application in force in a province"