+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

New changes in economic immigration

hopecanada15

Member
Feb 12, 2011
11
0
I just saw the changes for July 1 in the media centre of the CIC .
Firsth of all I'm very sorry for everyone affected by them and I hope they can maybe rush things and present an application before july 1 .
I read the document 3 times and I have a big doubt , maybe someone more experienced than me can help . In the document first they speak generally about economic immigrants in the introductive sentence , than they speak about Skilled Worker , federal Immigrant Investor and federal Entrepreneurs , and for each of this classes they say what changes they're going to make .
There's not a word about the Self Employed Person Class . I'm very interested in this class , but at the moment my qualifications fall a little short and I think ( I'm not sure ) my application would not be approuved . So there is my problem : will the changes affect even the Self Employed Class and they simply didn't mention it or is that class going to remain the same for the moment ? It's not so long I'm reading all the news at the CIC and so I don't know how they normally do .
I'm asking that because , if there are going to be changes I would probably rush and apply before July 1 even having little chances , but I would prefer not to do so if there is no hurry for me .
Good luck to everyone
 

PMM

VIP Member
Jun 30, 2005
25,494
1,950
Hi

hopecanada15 said:
I just saw the changes for July 1 in the media centre of the CIC .
Firsth of all I'm very sorry for everyone affected by them and I hope they can maybe rush things and present an application before july 1 .
I read the document 3 times and I have a big doubt , maybe someone more experienced than me can help . In the document first they speak generally about economic immigrants in the introductive sentence , than they speak about Skilled Worker , federal Immigrant Investor and federal Entrepreneurs , and for each of this classes they say what changes they're going to make .
There's not a word about the Self Employed Person Class . I'm very interested in this class , but at the moment my qualifications fall a little short and I think ( I'm not sure ) my application would not be approuved . So there is my problem : will the changes affect even the Self Employed Class and they simply didn't mention it or is that class going to remain the same for the moment ? It's not so long I'm reading all the news at the CIC and so I don't know how they normally do .
I'm asking that because , if there are going to be changes I would probably rush and apply before July 1 even having little chances , but I would prefer not to do so if there is no hurry for me .
Good luck to everyone
As no changes were announced for self-employed, then there are no changes in the program.
 

moyrzg

Hero Member
Jun 24, 2011
514
11
Category........
Visa Office......
SG
NOC Code......
3131
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04-07-11 received by MIKE on 08-07-11
Doc's Request.
BD encashed as per email 18aug2011
Nomination.....
2nd Mail Aor by singapore v.o --- 24 oct 2011
AOR Received.
1st PER RECEIVED 4TH OCTOBER
IELTS Request
submitted with application:GENERAL
File Transfer...
ECAS: We Started Processing on.October 24,2012
Med's Request
medical results have been received on ecas as of 3pm 28jan 2013
Med's Done....
medical done nov 22 sent to manila embassy dec 13
Summary: Current vs. Proposed Federal Skilled Worker Points Grid

Selection Criteria Current System Proposed System
Education 25 25
Language 24 28
Work Experience 21 15
Age 10 12
Arranged Employment 10 10
Adaptability 10 10
Total 100 100


http://www.filipinojournal.com/alberta/our-columnnist/immigration-news/proposed-changes-to-the-federal-skilled-workers-fsw-program.html
 

hopecanada15

Member
Feb 12, 2011
11
0
Hi Moyrzg , it seems you're really well informed about the proposed changes . Thanks for sharing , I think it will be very helpful for a lot of people .
Do you know what is going to happen to the Self Employed Persons Class ? They don' t mention it but I want to be as sure as possible that there will be no changes in that class .
Where do you find all this informations ? It would be so good to know things a little in advance to make the best decisions .
Thanks for all
 

moyrzg

Hero Member
Jun 24, 2011
514
11
Category........
Visa Office......
SG
NOC Code......
3131
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04-07-11 received by MIKE on 08-07-11
Doc's Request.
BD encashed as per email 18aug2011
Nomination.....
2nd Mail Aor by singapore v.o --- 24 oct 2011
AOR Received.
1st PER RECEIVED 4TH OCTOBER
IELTS Request
submitted with application:GENERAL
File Transfer...
ECAS: We Started Processing on.October 24,2012
Med's Request
medical results have been received on ecas as of 3pm 28jan 2013
Med's Done....
medical done nov 22 sent to manila embassy dec 13
hopecanada15
thnx but was sharing this info i also just got from the CIC site...

still must check on JULY 1st itself to know the details...
what I have was jst
proposed... so this may or may not be.....
 

moyrzg

Hero Member
Jun 24, 2011
514
11
Category........
Visa Office......
SG
NOC Code......
3131
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
04-07-11 received by MIKE on 08-07-11
Doc's Request.
BD encashed as per email 18aug2011
Nomination.....
2nd Mail Aor by singapore v.o --- 24 oct 2011
AOR Received.
1st PER RECEIVED 4TH OCTOBER
IELTS Request
submitted with application:GENERAL
File Transfer...
ECAS: We Started Processing on.October 24,2012
Med's Request
medical results have been received on ecas as of 3pm 28jan 2013
Med's Done....
medical done nov 22 sent to manila embassy dec 13
moyrzg said:
hopecanada15
thnx but was sharing this info i also just got from the CIC site...

still must check on JULY 1st itself to know the details...
what I have was jst
proposed... so this may or may not be.....

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) is planning to make changes to the existing FSW selection criteria points that were established in 2002.



A recent evaluation of the FSW program showed that though the existing selection criteria points based on: education, language proficiency, work experience, age, whether the applicant has arranged employment in Canada and the applicant’s overall adaptability (eg. spouse’s education, previous work or study in Canada, direct relatives in Canada) is working well ... there is room for improvement. The changes will not alter the existing six (6) selection criteria but it will change the number of points assigned to the criteria and the way points are assessed or allocated.

Listed below are the proposed changes to the existing FSW program:

1. Greater emphasis on language proficiency – CIC proposes to increase maximum points for the first official language proficiency from 16 to 20 points and at the same time introduce minimum language requirements based on occupation. CIC will consult on increasing the maximum points awarded for proficiency in language and on establishing minimum language requirements depending on the immigrant’s skill level. For example, managers or professionals would have different requirement from trades people. Rationale: A 2005 Statistics Canada study found that the employment rates of immigrants increased relative to their English or French language proficiency. It also found that language proficiency had the biggest positive impact on the immigrant’s ability to work in high-skilled professions. Language proficiency is an important factor in an immigrant’s success.

2. More points based on age – CIC proposes to increase maximum points for age from 10 to 12 points. Maximum points will be awarded until age 35, with a gradual decrease of points until age 49. No age points will be awarded after age 50. Rationale: Research shows that immigrants who arrive between the ages of 20 to 30 have been found to have the greatest positive economic impact on the receiving country. In contrast, immigrants aged 45 years and older experience unemployment rates almost double those aged 25 to 34 years old. Younger immigrants are more likely to adapt more quickly to their new environment and provide greater positive contribution to the economy. Approximately 27% of FSW immigrants who arrived between 2000 and 2006 were over the age of 40 and Canada wants to attract younger immigrants.

3. Reduce years of education required – CIC proposes to reduce the number of years of education required to claim points for trade or non-university post secondary education. This change will improve eligibility of skilled trade persons, technicians and apprentices who have valid post secondary education but not the required number of years of study. Rationale: Canada is facing shortages of workers in certain skilled trades.

Immigrants can help address this need. Skilled trades people currently make up less than 3% of all FSW applicants. CIC wants to help qualified trades people immigrate to Canada. Education points are now based on the university degree or trade diploma (ie. post secondary education) and the number of years of education completed. The required years of education is intended to help ensure the quality of the credential. However, years of education required reflects the Canadian educational system and fails to take into account the differences with respect to the immigrant’s home country school system.

4. Reduce points based on work experience – CIC proposes to decrease the maximum points awarded to work experience from 21 to 15 points. It is also proposed to increase the range of years within which points are allotted. This means that applicants need to have more work experience in order to get awarded maximum points. The points previously allotted to work experience will be reallocated to age and language proficiency selection criteria. Rationale: Research shows that the FSW program places more weight on foreign work experience compared to other countries.

Study shows that foreign work experience is a weak predictor of success in the Canadian labour market. Currently, an applicant is awarded 21 points for only 4 years of work experience. The overall weight of foreign work experience in the selection criteria will be reduced to more accurately reflect its true value.

5. More rigorous rules on Arranged Employment Offers – CIC proposes more strict regulatory provisions and definitions to enforce tighter front-end assessment of the potential employer and the job being offered. Provisions are also proposed to increase the Visa Officer’s authority to assess the validity/genuineness of the job offer and the applicant’s qualifications and ability to perform the job being offered. The changes could also require employers to sign a document confirming their commitment to hire the immigrant and restrictions or penalties to the employers, if they do not fulfill their written commitment. Rationale: Arranged Employment Offer awards the applicant a total of 15 points in the FSW selection criteria (ie. 10 points for arranged employment and 5 points for adaptability) and waives the requirement for settlement funds. Due to these advantages, this selection criterion has been susceptible to exploitation of persons attempting to immigrate with a fraudulent job offer. Employers sometimes provide bogus job offers for a fee to recruiting agencies that in turn victimizes unknowing would be immigrants.

Summary: Current vs. Proposed Federal Skilled Worker Points Grid

Selection Criteria Current System Proposed System
Education 25 25
Language 24 28
Work Experience 21 15
Age 10 12
Arranged Employment 10 10
Adaptability 10 10
Total 100 100
The above listed changes are just proposals at this time. CIC is meeting with various groups to solicit comments and input with regards to the proposed changes. Results of the consultations and final changes to the FSW program will be announced in the future.

In the meantime, I encourage all eligible FSW applicants to submit their applications as soon as possible before any proposed changes take effect. Good luck to you all.

Legal Disclaimer:
This news article is designed for general information only. The information presented in this article should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a consultant/client relationship. Each individual situation is different and people should seek proper advice on their specific cases with a licensed immigration consultant of their choice.