My partner who is coming from Mexico said that public hospitals won’t test him no matter what. He has a to pay a lot to go to a private lab.
Let's be clear: it already costs money to travel and the cost imposed is part of the point (even if a small part). They don't want people to travel right now. This makes it harder - for Canadians returning too.
This is NOT a policy to make travel easier, but to make it harder, because such travel makes the burden on the health system higher.
Also will airport authorities call the clinic to confirm the authenticity of the actual test, that its not just a fake piece of typed up paper from Juarez? Yeah I doubt they will be calling 5000 clinics a day around the world. Its all for just a bullshit show to the Canadian public.
Sure, there is always some possibility of fake tests. But that too has a cost - making it less convenient to travel.
I know I'm repeating myself:
they don't want people to travel right now.
And be careful what you wish for: for those from countries where the medical system cannot/does not provide authentic tests and there are often fakes, expect more visa restrictions. (Although in practice these are probably also countries where visas are already required and/or relatively less travel to Canada anyway)
Plus, I wonder about the gap between test date, test result date and travel date. For us, it likely requires travel to a high risk area to leave the country, which increases risk of spread.
No measure is perfect, nor perfectly fair. Refer to point above: they don't want you to travel right now.
I also question whether there are many countries from which travel to a high risk area to get tested is distinct from travel to the high risk areas that are the large urban agglomerations where airports are located and from which a very high percentage of voyages to Canada begin or transit. Really all of the international airports in Canada, or at least those that account for the bulk of the arrivals, are also high risk areas.
Note: I am in no way attempting to say that these measures are sufficient, or entirely effective, or the most effective way to deal with covid, or the most cost-effective, or fair, etc. I don't agree with large parts of it personally.
But absolutely the LEAST effective arguments against this policy are that it is inconvenient or imposes additional costs on travellers. They
do not want you to travel right now - but are allowing that travel under limited circumstances. Making it less convenient and more costly is not a bug, it's a feature.
Now of course it's also fine to complain and write here about various aspects of it - perfectly normal - in order to let off steam; by all means. But most of these arguments are not at all convincing.
(And yes - some politicians are entitled jerks, and some of them are paying the price right now for it. I think that's a good thing. In lots of countries politicians are ignoring restrictions entirely with little blowback)