Any advice for making this more likely would be appreciated.
I am a Canadian Citizen in a romantic relationship with a Chinese Citizen. We recently legally married in China. Our original plan was to marry in Canada so my family could meet him but Immigration denied his visitor visa so that didn't work out. Anyways, we've applied for permanent residency since then to eventually get around the huge headache of visa applications.
We are about to try applying for the fourth time while the PR is still in process. The last time we applied was about 5 months ago. Not sure if it will work out or not, or if it's wise. Honestly, I don't have a lot of hope. But I can't let go of the thought that *maybe* this time they can grant it and he can finally meet my family so we're willing to try one more time before just giving up and waiting for PR to go through. I noted IRCC recently updated their definition of "dual-intent" for foreign spouses wanting to reunite with Canadian spouses to increase the acceptance rate. It gives me a little hope. But perhaps you all can help by giving a little advice on what went wrong the last time and otherwise make this attempt a little more likely to succeed.
I have GMCS notes from the last time. See below their overall take on things.
"The applicant's assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for themselves.
The applicant's plan of visit appears vague and poorly documented.
Taking the applicant's purpose of visit into account and the documentation provided the Applicant does not demonstrate sufficient establishment or sufficient family ties to motivate return. I am not satisfied PA is bona fide visitor and that the proposed visit would be a reasonable expense.
Given family ties or economic motives to remain in Canada, the applicant's incentives to remain in Canada may outweigh their ties to their home country.
Applicant has limited family in home country; strong pull factors to Canada. The purpose of visit does not appear reasonable given the applicant's socio-economic situation.
The applicant has significant family ties in Canada.
The purpose of the applicant's visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given hte details provided in the application."
What we had then:
-We listed reason for visit was to "get married in Canada." Perhaps they took that as him paying for the wedding?
-My foreign spouse has been a student for the last 6 months for work-related upgrade courses. So no, he did not have consistent income at the time. I realize that was a negative factor, but not much we could do about that.
-Despite being a student for a substantial period, he still has 30000 CAD+ in bank accounts, (we did not include my own Canadian assets) which was reflected in the previous application. But again, not sufficient.
-Family in China are just his parents and a bunch of cousins. Due to China's previous one-child law, most of China is much the same. He doesn't exactly financially support them other than paying for new appliances every now and then.
-"Family ties in Canada" is just me, the then-fiancee and now spouse. I suppose one fiancee outweighs his whole life in China. At the time I was even a student in China, so I was also not going to be in Canada long. So I'm not sure why they said he wasn't going to leave when I was also not going to be in the country. But I digress. I am now almost about to return to Canada and resume work.
- He does not own property. Because it's expensive to buy apartments in China. Not feasible to fix this in our time-frame.
- the "Plan of visit" at the time of previous application was visiting my parents, stay at their house, travel around the area, meet with marriage officiant to plan wedding, have wedding, then return to China. I gave specific dates for when he was to arrive and to leave. But I suppose that was too vague?
What we have for this time around:
-Legal marriage certificate
-PR application in process (dual intent, etc.)
-New, well-paying job post-studies with papers to prove.
We plan for a short period of two weeks to visit Canada.
Any advice?
Thanks in advance.
I am a Canadian Citizen in a romantic relationship with a Chinese Citizen. We recently legally married in China. Our original plan was to marry in Canada so my family could meet him but Immigration denied his visitor visa so that didn't work out. Anyways, we've applied for permanent residency since then to eventually get around the huge headache of visa applications.
We are about to try applying for the fourth time while the PR is still in process. The last time we applied was about 5 months ago. Not sure if it will work out or not, or if it's wise. Honestly, I don't have a lot of hope. But I can't let go of the thought that *maybe* this time they can grant it and he can finally meet my family so we're willing to try one more time before just giving up and waiting for PR to go through. I noted IRCC recently updated their definition of "dual-intent" for foreign spouses wanting to reunite with Canadian spouses to increase the acceptance rate. It gives me a little hope. But perhaps you all can help by giving a little advice on what went wrong the last time and otherwise make this attempt a little more likely to succeed.
I have GMCS notes from the last time. See below their overall take on things.
"The applicant's assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for themselves.
The applicant's plan of visit appears vague and poorly documented.
Taking the applicant's purpose of visit into account and the documentation provided the Applicant does not demonstrate sufficient establishment or sufficient family ties to motivate return. I am not satisfied PA is bona fide visitor and that the proposed visit would be a reasonable expense.
Given family ties or economic motives to remain in Canada, the applicant's incentives to remain in Canada may outweigh their ties to their home country.
Applicant has limited family in home country; strong pull factors to Canada. The purpose of visit does not appear reasonable given the applicant's socio-economic situation.
The applicant has significant family ties in Canada.
The purpose of the applicant's visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given hte details provided in the application."
What we had then:
-We listed reason for visit was to "get married in Canada." Perhaps they took that as him paying for the wedding?
-My foreign spouse has been a student for the last 6 months for work-related upgrade courses. So no, he did not have consistent income at the time. I realize that was a negative factor, but not much we could do about that.
-Despite being a student for a substantial period, he still has 30000 CAD+ in bank accounts, (we did not include my own Canadian assets) which was reflected in the previous application. But again, not sufficient.
-Family in China are just his parents and a bunch of cousins. Due to China's previous one-child law, most of China is much the same. He doesn't exactly financially support them other than paying for new appliances every now and then.
-"Family ties in Canada" is just me, the then-fiancee and now spouse. I suppose one fiancee outweighs his whole life in China. At the time I was even a student in China, so I was also not going to be in Canada long. So I'm not sure why they said he wasn't going to leave when I was also not going to be in the country. But I digress. I am now almost about to return to Canada and resume work.
- He does not own property. Because it's expensive to buy apartments in China. Not feasible to fix this in our time-frame.
- the "Plan of visit" at the time of previous application was visiting my parents, stay at their house, travel around the area, meet with marriage officiant to plan wedding, have wedding, then return to China. I gave specific dates for when he was to arrive and to leave. But I suppose that was too vague?
What we have for this time around:
-Legal marriage certificate
-PR application in process (dual intent, etc.)
-New, well-paying job post-studies with papers to prove.
We plan for a short period of two weeks to visit Canada.
Any advice?
Thanks in advance.