Dear Dony H,
Suin was referring to her experience, not mine. She was doing what is commonly referred to as "sharing," which is a part of "socializing," a healthy and normal way to behave. You should try looking those words up, Dony H; perhaps Wikipedia will offer useful information if you are not proficient in the use of a dictionary.
No, a TRV was never required for me, as I am a Swedish citizen.
I did follow the rule of law, which is why I did receive a visa and was granted Permanent Residence. You simply have no clue what the law is.
Inland processing centres are much more severely overworked than outland visa posts, so I actually contributed to resource preservation at the CIC. No compensation is necessary; your sincere appreciation and thanks will suffice.
Lastly, the rule of law that you like to refer to requires you to land to be granted Permanent Resident status. If you consider this a "useless ritual," please write to your MP and ask him to change the law instead of insulting us on this forum.
I've asked you twice already in other threads, so perhaps the third time will be the charm: will you please stop posting useless and factually incorrect posts, and go study basic immigration law so you can actually contribute something to the forum?
If not, perhaps you should simply stop posting. We would all appreciate it.
Thank you!
dony h said:
Suin: You were referring to a temporary resident visa while Karl was giving a lengthy account of getting his permant resident visa stamped on his passport; it was all much to do about nothing. He could simply follow the rule of law without wasting an already under-staffed human resource of CIC. Both of a TRV and a PRV was normally required at the border town for a person to enter Canada and in the case of Karl, he was already living in Canada under a different visa. Why both to follow such a useless ritual to "re-enter" or "to be landed" as an immigrant?