Mistakenly Misrepresented on Schedule A Form

[Stressed123]

Hello,

Please help, I mistakenly ticket No on Schedule A form saying my Wife/ PA was not refused admission to any country. Now, LVO is saying I have misrepresented and she/ PA might not meet requirement to move to Canada, but they have told me to send them an updated form and answer truthfully. But, I also notice, that I have should said Yes to one question before that which was have you ever been refused visa to any country. Because, my wife was denied USA visa twice.

Do you guys think updating Schedule and answering truthfully now will correct these mistakes and in explanation should I say it was a honest mistake?

Thank you very much everyone, I only have limited time please answer.

 

[Buletruck]

Answered here: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/mistakenly-misrepresented-on-schedule-a-form.565670/

You really need to resubmit the form as requested. If LVO has said they will accept a new form with the correct information, I don’t see any reason to doubt them. And include all your “oversights”, as they are probably already aware of them and just waiting to see if you include them before rendering a decision. Remember, Canada and the US share immigration information, so the past refusals are easily identified.

 

[Stressed123]

Answered here: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/mistakenly-misrepresented-on-schedule-a-form.565670/

You really need to resubmit the form as requested. If LVO has said they will accept a new form with the correct information, I don’t see any reason to doubt them. And include all your “oversights”, as they are probably already aware of them and just waiting to see if you include them before rendering a decision. Remember, Canada and the US share immigration information, so the past refusals are easily identified.

Thank you very much, really helpful.

 

[Buletruck]

And include a letter explaining why there was the oversight. No long meander stories, just clear and concise facts why there was an oversight of facts.