Thanks for the clarification, makes more sense nowNAFTA.couple said:I do see that for some reason the file transfer on January 19 shows an irregular format.
Thanks for the clarification, makes more sense nowNAFTA.couple said:I do see that for some reason the file transfer on January 19 shows an irregular format.
The following informaton i took it from another forum and pasted it here:reginac said:Thanks God I found this forum.
I will resume my situation and hope to get some advice or someone who share her/his own experience.
I had an inland spousal sponsorship application, after 2 years we got our interview and everything went so wrong and we got refused.
I will resume our case...I came to Canada as tourist and one month later I met my husband, I overstayed in Canada because of our relationship (he is Canadian citizen) and after 2 years of being boyfriend-girlfriend we moved in together and a few months later we got married. We apply inland because it was the best option because of my situation. We even got a consultant to guide us through the process and we had a strong case with proof and evidence of everything since the first day we met, also we have friends as witnesses of our relationship. After 2 years of process we finally got our interview and it went wrong because it seems like the officer had a HUGE problem with me for being "underground" for that period of time. We left the office with positive attitude because other than the lack of status everything was RIGHT, one month later we got the refusal letter and the reason was "Marriage of Convenience". We have a right to appeal but we can't provide any new evidence, the new decision would be based on the officer's NOTES during the interview. He never asked us the same questions and he told us -You can't get a PR so easily, you have a huge problem coming here after years of being illegal and asking for PR, If I approve you, You will go and tell everyone how easy is to come to Canada overstayed and get PR.
We were in shock after reading "marriage of convenience" and we got the advise that the best way to go from now on is to apply via outland, It will take around 15-16 months to get an answer and the other option is to appeal to Federal Court spend tons of money, hire a lawyer and wait for them to review my application again and as I said the new decision will be based in the officer's Notes. The process can take 1 year or longer. It is so unfair that my decision was based in personal issues and not what the law say, but I guess the officer was so smart to put us in a "fake" relationship.
I will love to hear from someone whose app. was refused and now is applying outland, please share your experience and any other advise will be appreciate.
Thank u and sorry for the long post.
I think we have a similar timeline, so I am curious if the letter requesting your documents indicated that you have 60 days to respond to their document request from the date of letter. The reason I am asking is that ours included that we had 60 days to respond from February 2nd. Unfortunately this letter arrived to Canada after 58 days, allowing essentially 2 days to get the constancia, a police certificate from Mexico City (which doesn't actually exist in itself) and a new medical exam. Needless to say stress resulted upon receipt of the letter.mrandmrsromero said:Congrats nafta.couple! Nice to hear some good news.
I just got back from a nice long visit with my husband in Mexico. He is hoping the constancia is ready for pick up this week. Other than that, we're in a holding pattern waiting for FBI police certificate to come back. Hopefully within next 2-3 weeks. It will be such a relief to have the police clearances over with and dropped off at the embassy!!!!
La_Ardilla said:I think we have a similar timeline, so I am curious if the letter requesting your documents indicated that you have 60 days to respond to their document request from the date of letter. The reason I am asking is that ours included that we had 60 days to respond from February 2nd. Unfortunately this letter arrived to Canada after 58 days, allowing essentially 2 days to get the constancia, a police certificate from Mexico City (which doesn't actually exist in itself) and a new medical exam. Needless to say stress resulted upon receipt of the letter.
mrandmrsromero said:Congrats nafta.couple! Nice to hear some good news.
I just got back from a nice long visit with my husband in Mexico. He is hoping the constancia is ready for pick up this week. Other than that, we're in a holding pattern waiting for FBI police certificate to come back. Hopefully within next 2-3 weeks. It will be such a relief to have the police clearances over with and dropped off at the embassy!!!!
We had the same problem We have a 60 day deadline to respond and we didn't receive the letter until THREE WEEKS after the date of the letter. My husband immediately emailed the embassy to request an extension of time, pointing out the date of the letter and date of receipt. He explained that we do not know how long the FBI is going to take to mail back the results. They wrote back and gave us a 90 day extension and said that no further extensions would be granted. Said that if the reports were not received at the end of the new deadline that our file would be assessed based on the information they have on file which could mean refusal. And that, we can reapply of course, IF WE PAY THE FEE AGAIN!!! Needless to say, we are praying every day that those FBI clearances are processed reasonably quickly so we don't pass any more deadlines. We actually had his prints double checked before we fedexed them to the US so hoping for the best. But, OY, the stress.La_Ardilla said:I think we have a similar timeline, so I am curious if the letter requesting your documents indicated that you have 60 days to respond to their document request from the date of letter. The reason I am asking is that ours included that we had 60 days to respond from February 2nd. Unfortunately this letter arrived to Canada after 58 days, allowing essentially 2 days to get the constancia, a police certificate from Mexico City (which doesn't actually exist in itself) and a new medical exam. Needless to say stress resulted upon receipt of the letter.
This is good to know, thanks for responding. I really wish they would respond to the e-mail I sent so my mind can be at ease. I also contacted my MPs office (first time ever) and they are looking into it as well, I explained I couldn't wait 2 weeks to hear a response from the Embassy. Hopefully you will get the FBI certificate in time! At least we finally received the letter, I was getting pretty tired of scampering to the mailbox each day only to be disappointed.mrandmrsromero said:We had the same problem We have a 60 day deadline to respond and we didn't receive the letter until THREE WEEKS after the date of the letter. My husband immediately emailed the embassy to request an extension of time, pointing out the date of the letter and date of receipt. He explained that we do not know how long the FBI is going to take to mail back the results. They wrote back and gave us a 90 day extension and said that no further extensions would be granted. Said that if the reports were not received at the end of the new deadline that our file would be assessed based on the information they have on file which could mean refusal. And that, we can reapply of course, IF WE PAY THE FEE AGAIN!!! Needless to say, we are praying every day that those FBI clearances are processed reasonably quickly so we don't pass any more deadlines. We actually had his prints double checked before we fedexed them to the US so hoping for the best. But, OY, the stress.
I guess the only grief they are giving me is not responding to the e-mails asking for an extension. I think it will be okay. We've dealt with this very rationally by making a medical exam appointment in Toronto (we live in Winnipeg). The things we do under duress.NAFTA.couple said:Peoples,
We are ecstatic, to put it mildly. I was already thinking about what to do in case of a refusal (sooo impatient, I know).
Ardilla, did they give you grief about extending the 60-day period? My letter did have the same limit.
mrandmrsromero, I'm glad you can at least visit with each other. I was refused a visitor's visa (before even applying for PR), and I wanted it because my wife was very ill so there was no way she could visit me. It was a really bad time for us. She's now all fine and we're just thinking about what needs to be done in the next 7 weeks. Anyone know of someone who's interested in a Celestron Advanced Series 9.25" SCT?
Cheerio
I hear you on that one. There is no doubt in my mind that going through this process has the power to transform even the most serene, zen, chilled out individual on the planet into a neurotic, anxiety-ridden, mailbox-stalking mess!La_Ardilla said:The things we do under duress.
At least we can all go bananas together Its amazing the scenarios and "what ifs" that my mind can come up with......mrandmrsromero said:I hear you on that one. There is no doubt in my mind that going through this process has the power to transform even the most serene, zen, chilled out individual on the planet into a neurotic, anxiety-ridden, mailbox-stalking mess!
I am all too familiar with "the situation room". It is my curse to work for lawyers.La_Ardilla said:My partner keeps on telling me to go and drink some water when I get a little nutty. I am very hydrated these days.
I like to cope with these things by going into what I call "the situtation room", basically its my laptop, printer, some paperclips and sharpies on a table in the corner of the living room. It makes me feel better when I can make copies of letters, make lists and highlight things.
One of my worst case scenarios was an earthquake in Mexico City (bad for everyone), so the news this morning definitely caught my attention. Other crazy thoughts are narcos hijacking fedex trucks.