Marriage Misrepresentation
- Thread starter Natz_K
- Start date
Tarzan don't care about it. You guys are judging him base on the standard of the society that you are living in. Like I said, you don't know the guy background so give him a break, he might be the second Tarzan or Mr. Robinson.
sir,with all due respect,have you never done anything wrong...at some stage...may be in school?college? Work place? in public transport ..,
have you never jumped queue in hurry ...?
it is not 'un'normal that ppl do so..,
and ppl crossing over illegally are also not deported without a fair hearing...that speaks of the gravity of the 'crime'...may be he too felt threatened or deprived that he thought of sneaking in...
I wouldn't be glad if someone has to forego his dream just because he tried to jump the queue..
it's like sending a kid home from in front of Disneyland & to ban him for life,for having tried to sneak in with few cents short of the ticket...
I think the issue is, some have suggested he "right this wrong" by digging himself deeper with more lies. The best thing the OP can do is consult an immigration attorney, NOT an immigration forum.
He needed an opinion, not everyone's comments or judgement. As to what he can do, please seek legal advice or as @scylla suggested, withdraw your application. In any case, be prepared to explain this whole situation in your next application if given a chance. Good luck!
I'd also suggest contacting @legalfalcon to have another opinion.
P.S. it takes courage to admit what you did. Let it be your learning lesson and promise yourself to be more.open from now on. I wish you Good luck!
I'd also suggest contacting @legalfalcon to have another opinion.
P.S. it takes courage to admit what you did. Let it be your learning lesson and promise yourself to be more.open from now on. I wish you Good luck!
Last edited:
I don't agree with this: I think we should absolutely judge someone deciding to move to Canada by Canadian cultural values or laws: this is the one case where I feel "previous" background or cultures shouldn't matter.
It's a harsh lesson, and I do hope he doesn't get banned: but this was not an honest mistake. It was a deliberate decision taken after seeing the misrepresentation would boost his scores.
It does not even push his score. Having no wife or having unaccompanied wife are the same. Base on your logic, all the people who declare their wives will not accompany them to get the PR then later sponsor their wives should be on the hook also.
By saying "I think we should absolutely judge someone deciding to move to Canada by Canadian cultural values or laws", you don't even understand Canadian culture. You are just reflecting your culture onto Canadian.
Edit: 'accompanied wife' to 'unaccompanied wife'. Sorry for my typo, I was thinking 'unaccompanied' but typed 'accompanied'
Last edited:
The bolded part is simply not true. There can be a considerable difference between applying as a single applicant or as married with accompanying spouse.
Hmmm...I suspect he meant difference between applying as a single applicant and as married with an UNaccompanying spouse...
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/express-entry/grid-crs.asp#a1 - for the breakdown.
If you indeed meant what crescent posted then yes, no difference CRS wise.
Do what you have to do to avoid a ban and/or rejection. This world is a like a rat race and it's unfair, don't listen to the people here talking as if they're fault-free.
Many people here think they deserve to get PR in Canada just because they meet the requirements. However, A huge part of the reason as to why they meet the requirements is because of external factors aka they were lucky in life.
Do what you gotta do! You only live once.
Many people here think they deserve to get PR in Canada just because they meet the requirements. However, A huge part of the reason as to why they meet the requirements is because of external factors aka they were lucky in life.
Do what you gotta do! You only live once.