Thanks for this. Calling them can be so hit and miss: sometimes you can connect with someone pretty quickly, other times you get stuck in a swirling vortex that turns out to be a drain into oblivion....
I too was asked for addition proof of cohabitation, and I’ve been struggling with the actual meaning of this request. So, I’m legally married to my spouse, and we’re in love, and, as an Inland Spousual PR applicant, we both clearly live in in Canada. Are they thinking me and my spouse are in love, and in Canada, but we live apart?! And for proof they suggest we supply mortgage or lease contract with both of us listed on it. Or utility bills in both our names? What tourist marries a Canadian and buys a home or enters into a 1+ year lease agreement in Canada while they’re still technically a tourist? It’s ludicrous to even couch this type of request this way. Pandemic notwithstanding, as a ‘tourist’, if I had a lease agreement in my name in Canada any CBSA border guard would think they’ve hit the jackpot when I crossed the border into Canada...
Sadly, I believe this is IRCC’s passive-aggressive way to say they need more proof that our relationship is legitimate. Which is a reasonable request. Why don’t they just ask this instead?
I’m a March PR + OWP applicant and have been in-country since February. Last week I had to cross the border for 2 hours to check on our place just across the border. Upon my return CBSA nailed me to a cross, in spite of my having my all my paperwork in order. The agents problem? I’d been in Canada for a year and had no official status - he said my application for an OWP meant absolutely nothing towards my time in Canada, and that he could arrest me on the spot for overstaying. Fortunately I kept my cool, and a sympathetic Superintendent who knew me from numerous previous crossings talked the first agent down and I was allowed to return.
Gahh, this entire process has reached ludicrous mode...
/end rant