Zee.One
Hero Member
- Dec 16, 2011
- 27
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- London
- NOC Code......
- 2121
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 14-10-2011
- Nomination.....
- PER Received 10-01-2012
- IELTS Request
- 8 bands Sent with Application
- File Transfer...
- In Process 10-01-2012
- Med's Request
- 10-03-2013
- Med's Done....
- 25-04-2013
- Interview........
- 14-02-2013
- Passport Req..
- PPR-1 (31-05-13) PPR-2 (25-06-13)
- VISA ISSUED...
- 09-07-2013
- LANDED..........
- Sep/October
Dear Friends,
In my opinion CIC is adopting their immigration system considering benchmarking of Australian immigration infrastructure which is highly professional immigration process based on their most wanted occupation but they have created another critical & piriority list for processing purpose.
Logically speaking new expected changes should to be implemented on new applicants. If it is the case following will be consequences.
1. MI4 will be their piriority and MI3 will go behind the curtain and move more slowly because MI4 will be most desired applicants.
2. You cannot neglect the chances of implementation of new rules to old applicants pool because Australian did same 2-4 years back.
3. You can expect anything from CIC after witnessing a brutel decision regarding returning pre 2008 applications.
4. I am seeing on daily basis a lot of refused 2010 application due to JD mismachment from LVO which indicate less piriority.
In the last but not least, I am very optimistic about our cases yet realistic to expect a more slow processing after new changes announcement. I invite you all to comment on my individual opinion simultaneously i asked all of you to sugguest a back up plan.
Regards
In my opinion CIC is adopting their immigration system considering benchmarking of Australian immigration infrastructure which is highly professional immigration process based on their most wanted occupation but they have created another critical & piriority list for processing purpose.
Logically speaking new expected changes should to be implemented on new applicants. If it is the case following will be consequences.
1. MI4 will be their piriority and MI3 will go behind the curtain and move more slowly because MI4 will be most desired applicants.
2. You cannot neglect the chances of implementation of new rules to old applicants pool because Australian did same 2-4 years back.
3. You can expect anything from CIC after witnessing a brutel decision regarding returning pre 2008 applications.
4. I am seeing on daily basis a lot of refused 2010 application due to JD mismachment from LVO which indicate less piriority.
In the last but not least, I am very optimistic about our cases yet realistic to expect a more slow processing after new changes announcement. I invite you all to comment on my individual opinion simultaneously i asked all of you to sugguest a back up plan.
Regards