I have thought about that. I am not sure if you remember few weeks back when the numbers where being published, one update had lesser numbers than the previous one for a certain NOC (1 less application in 2 NOCs).
The same thing could have happened with 1122 and CIO had to open other applications to fill the spots emptied by whatever caused the app to be rejected. Obviously they cannot turn back to applicants from 8th of July who's application was already heading home, instead they chose another 1122 who is qualified enough (preferably paid using DD as it is more secure than CC, and had obvious abvious advantage over the other applicants i.e. scored more points) and encashed his DD regardless of when he applied (like Statish maybe????).
I am just trying to make sense of things here based on the updates from ALL MEMBERS of this forum, basing the analysis on the fact that the information posted is true until proven otherwise.
