I sometimes wonder what those consultants/lawyers smoke... and if they would be nice enough to share
I just read from the document checklist page on the IRCC websitekryt0n said:Indeed this is the first I have heard of that. I'm only uploading my bachelor's ECA etc. I'm not uploading 16 GCSE and 4 a level certificates. If for any reason I am asked for them I will explain they went provided because we do not have high school diplomas in the UK.
I shall call that the OR of reason!LWB said:I just read from the document checklist page on the IRCC website
"Proof of completed Canadian or foreign educational credentials can include copies of
secondary OR post-secondary education documents (certificates, diplomas or degrees); and
transcripts for successfully completed secondary OR post-secondary studies, if available."
So I am just going to do post-secondary
I did not get exit stamp in US during my departure from US to India. Not sure if they follow this process i.e. only admission Stamp, no exit. That made me think it should be for Home country. But would like to get others opinion as well.mvd said:Hi Guys,
Wanted your opinion on travel history -
Should I mention my travel dates from entering & exiting the visiting country,
OR
from date when I left my home country & landed back to home country?
TIA
You have to put both for you and your common law partner separately travel histories. If you were on some trips together, so there will be matching dates (in your and his travel history). Requirements is either 10 years of since you / he was 18 years old whichever is shorter. Travel history does not include trips to the countries of residency and to countries of citizenship (for example when you were working in Canada and you were visiting UK, that does not come there. But if you visited Canada before or after you had some kind of residency there, you shall add such trip).kryt0n said:Oooo another one. For the travel history section, do I upload all travel for me and my boyfriend here?
So for instance our travel for the past 5 years is identical, but before we were together it was different. Am I adding both or travel dates here?
So if I have been in Canada from 2011 until now, I visited my home country for 2 times for less than 1 months and never travel outside my home country and Canada. Should I answer NO to this question?vensak said:You have to put both for you and your common law partner separately travel histories. If you were on some trips together, so there will be matching dates (in your and his travel history). Requirements is either 10 years of since you / he was 18 years old whichever is shorter. Travel history does not include trips to the countries of residency and to countries of citizenship (for example when you were working in Canada and you were visiting UK, that does not come there. But if you visited Canada before or after you had some kind of residency there, you shall add such trip).
Thank you, I was just confused as it says kryt0n and family members.vensak said:You have to put both for you and your common law partner separately travel histories. If you were on some trips together, so there will be matching dates (in your and his travel history). Requirements is either 10 years of since you / he was 18 years old whichever is shorter. Travel history does not include trips to the countries of residency and to countries of citizenship (for example when you were working in Canada and you were visiting UK, that does not come there. But if you visited Canada before or after you had some kind of residency there, you shall add such trip).
If you were in Canada since you went 18 and you have only visited your home country, then you have no travel history.hongtam2629 said:So if I have been in Canada from 2011 until now, I visited my home country for 2 times for less than 1 months and never travel outside my home country and Canada. Should I answer NO to this question?
When putting number of dependants, you do not include those that have canadian PR or citizenship. So if your daughter is already Canadian, you will not include her and hence you will not provide any details about her (except in the family list).Calgary2014 said:My daughter was born in Canada so she is a Canadian Citizen.
I answered "No" to the following question because she doesn't need to apply for PR:
Is your child included in this application?
In the forms section there is a question asking" Will **** accompany you to Canada?
and the answer has been highlighted to "NO" and I cannot change it. Actually she will accompany me to Canada so what should I do?
Thanks for your response. Her name has been listed on "Unaccompanying child form" section. I cannot change the answer to the question "Will this child accompany you to Canada?" from "No" to yesvensak said:When putting number of dependants, you do not include those that have canadian PR or citizenship. So if your daughter is already Canadian, you will not include her and hence you will not provide any details about her (except in the family list).
Write loe to that. That child should be only mentioned in family section. Just wrie loe stating that she is canadian. As such she does not need medicals if i am not mistaken.Calgary2014 said:Thanks for your response. Her name has been listed on "Unaccompanying child form" section. I cannot change the answer to the question "Will this child accompany you to Canada?" from "No" to yes