Is it possible to request for urgent processing of Spousal Sponsorship?

[canuck_in_uk]

Obviously THE BIRTH OF A BABY IS A CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH SHOULD MITIGATE expedition. Jesus. Who are you? Where is your soul today?

A birth of a baby is not a reason to expedite an app. Try family planning.

 

[DollyM]

Obviously THE BIRTH OF A BABY IS A CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH SHOULD MITIGATE expedition. Jesus. Who are you? Where is your soul today?

If that's the case then wouldn't everyone simply get pregnant to jump the queue? What about those of us who were separated from our spouses who didn't want to or can't get pregnant? Should we have to wait longer because someone else decided to procreate?

My partner had a job offer he lost out on because it took so long for our visa. Shouldn't that be a circumstance which should mitigate expedition?

 

[shalenabennie]

Obviously THE BIRTH OF A BABY IS A CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH SHOULD MITIGATE expedition. Jesus. Who are you? Where is your soul today?[/QUOTE
It's unfortunate, but not cause for expedited service.

 

[dorkismalorkis]

If that's the case then wouldn't everyone simply get pregnant to jump the queue? What about those of us who were separated from our spouses who didn't want to or can't get pregnant? Should we have to wait longer because someone else decided to procreate?

My partner had a job offer he lost out on because it took so long for our visa. Shouldn't that be a circumstance which should mitigate expedition?

stop. because clearly a baby is a LIFETIME COMMITMENT. don't even pull that stuff. a BABY is no joke.

 

[dorkismalorkis]

A birth of a baby is not a reason to expedite an app. Try family planning.

Married people in a legitimate relationship are bound to HAVE BABIES if they want.
It is not a reason to expedite but it is a mitigating circumstance for EFFICIENT, consistent processing. Put yourself in those people's shoes. A baby is a new life and the birth of such life happens once. It is most vital in those first moments baby finds: MOM and then dad too. Dad is good for the wellbeing of MOM too. Just listen to yourselves.

 

[dorkismalorkis]

If that's the case then wouldn't everyone simply get pregnant to jump the queue? What about those of us who were separated from our spouses who didn't want to or can't get pregnant? Should we have to wait longer because someone else decided to procreate?

My partner had a job offer he lost out on because it took so long for our visa. Shouldn't that be a circumstance which should mitigate expedition?

Yes. Obviously a job offer would hopefully click in the mind of the processing officer that your case would be best processed as quick as possible. Those ARE things they hopefully would take into consideration. Legitimacy is key, jobs, babies, are more serious than just claiming to be conjugal or together, or whatever!

 

[kcward7]

Married people in a legitimate relationship are bound to HAVE BABIES if they want.
It is not a reason to expedite but it is a mitigating circumstance for EFFICIENT, consistent processing. Put yourself in those people's shoes. A baby is a new life and the birth of such life happens once. It is most vital in those first moments baby finds: MOM and then dad too. Dad is good for the wellbeing of MOM too. Just listen to yourselves.

It's not IRCC's responsibility to accommodate families just because they have children and/or are pregnant. Nor does IRCC stop married people in a legitimate relationship from having babies - but it certainly does not mean they should expedite because of this.

You are incredibly naive to think that families would not take advantage of expedited processing solely for that purpose if it was the case with pregnancies/childbirth.

Canuck is right - if you are not prepared to have a child while your application is in progress, use family planning.

 

[shalenabennie]

stop. because clearly a baby is a LIFETIME COMMITMENT. don't even pull that stuff. a BABY is no joke.

I'm not sure why your getting so upset with the people giving you honest replies. at the end of the day, just about everyone has a good reason to needing to be in Canada. Jobs, babies, sick parents, school opportunities, just about everything, and they are equally important to each applicant, which is why cic can't accommodate people on these grounds. First come first serve is the only way to keep it fair for everyone. it's unfortunate that people will miss the births of their children, but it is what it is and nothing can be done about it,so why get upset. If it's Incredibly important, the mother can travel and give birth in the fathers country. Inconvenient yes, but an option.

 

[Buletruck]

Legitimacy is key, jobs, babies, are more serious than just claiming to be conjugal or together, or whatever!

And who are you to determine what is more serious? Being separated from your spouse or children may not make your list for urgent or expedited processing, but that’s your opinion. And my opinion doesn’t align with yours. IRCC processes applications based on a process. If you are expecting them to waive or circumvent that process just to unite a pregnant mother, you risk litigation from others who feel they are treated as second class, simply because they didn’t assess the complications surrounding personal life choices, not to mention missing important information that they rely on other countries to provide.
You may not like it, but that’s how it works.

 

[canuck_in_uk]

stop. because clearly a baby is a LIFETIME COMMITMENT. don't even pull that stuff. a BABY is no joke.

People in Marriages of Convenience have babies too.

Married people in a legitimate relationship are bound to HAVE BABIES if they want.
It is not a reason to expedite but it is a mitigating circumstance for EFFICIENT, consistent processing. Put yourself in those people's shoes. A baby is a new life and the birth of such life happens once. It is most vital in those first moments baby finds: MOM and then dad too. Dad is good for the wellbeing of MOM too. Just listen to yourselves.

People can go right ahead and choose to have a child when there is no guarantee of being together for the birth. However, that is their personal and fairly stupid choice and does not entitle them to be processed any faster than the rest of us who used common sense to not got pregnant in such a situation. Again, family planning.

 

[dorkismalorkis]

I'm not sure why your getting so upset with the people giving you honest replies. at the end of the day, just about everyone has a good reason to needing to be in Canada. Jobs, babies, sick parents, school opportunities, just about everything, and they are equally important to each applicant, which is why cic can't accommodate people on these grounds. First come first serve is the only way to keep it fair for everyone. it's unfortunate that people will miss the births of their children, but it is what it is and nothing can be done about it,so why get upset. If it's Incredibly important, the mother can travel and give birth in the fathers country. Inconvenient yes, but an option.

People in Marriages of Convenience have babies too.



People can go right ahead and choose to have a child when there is no guarantee of being together for the birth. However, that is their personal and fairly stupid choice and does not entitle them to be processed any faster than the rest of us who used common sense to not got pregnant in such a situation. Again, family planning.

Not upset whatsoever.
We were in process for VISA LONG before getting pregnant. Visa denied because we are married.
To insinuate we do not have common sense because we are married and have been blessed with a child is shortsighted and ignorant
As is our case we do not expect expedition however it certainly does add a different LEVEL of credibility to cases when jobs, children or future children are involved.
I have done several interviews with MPs, former gov't officials and current people affiliated with the process to understand they evaluate every case on a case by case basis in order of receipt.



Have a great day.

 

[canuck_in_uk]

Not upset whatsoever.
We were in process for VISA LONG before getting pregnant. Visa denied because we are married.
To insinuate we do not have common sense because we are married and have been blessed with a child is shortsighted and ignorant
As is our case we do not expect expedition however it certainly does add a different LEVEL of credibility to cases when jobs, children or future children are involved.
I have done several interviews with MPs, former gov't officials and current people affiliated with the process to understand they evaluate every case on a case by case basis in order of receipt.



Have a great day.

I didn't say you don't have common sense because you are married and have a child. I said people have no common sense when they decide to have a child while living in different countries with no guarantee of being able to be together at the birth. There are so many threads on here asking "I'm pregnant, will my husband be here in time" and the answer is no. I agree that it is important for both parents to be at the birth. However, IRCC should not make concessions when processing apps because people make that decision to get pregnant mid-process, hence why I keep repeating family planning.

 

[dorkismalorkis]

I didn't say you don't have common sense because you are married and have a child. I said people have no common sense when they decide to have a child while living in different countries with no guarantee of being able to be together at the birth. There are so many threads on here asking "I'm pregnant, will my husband be here in time" and the answer is no. I agree that it is important for both parents to be at the birth. However, IRCC should not make concessions when processing apps because people make that decision to get pregnant mid-process, hence why I keep repeating family planning.

No one here made a decision to get pregnant mid process. Done going in circles with you. Look buddy, life happens. Do you really expect happily married people to wait what can be YEARS on the Canadian Gov't to dictate such a personal choice? As mentioned we were attempting travel visa's LONG before being pregnant. (Denied the visa bc we were married). We are happy and accepting either way but it would be nice to be together for the big event. There are different situations which add credibility to cases - certainly which make some cases more clear cut than others.

 

[canuck_in_uk]

No one here made a decision to get pregnant mid process. Done going in circles with you. Look buddy, life happens. Do you really expect happily married people to wait what can be YEARS on the Canadian Gov't to dictate such a personal choice? As mentioned we were attempting travel visa's LONG before being pregnant. (Denied the visa bc we were married). We are happy and accepting either way but it would be nice to be together for the big event. There are different situations which add credibility to cases - certainly which make some cases more clear cut than others.

?? The basis of this thread is "can my app be processed faster because I am pregnant", so obviously, someone made that exact decision.

I don't expect people to do anything. However, those that make the choice to get pregnant don't get to then turn around and ask for faster processing than the people who didn't make that choice.

As already stated, people in fake marriages have kids too.

 

[Eveslm]

Every person's case is important to them. No one should make someone else's case less important or feel that their case is more important than others. We all make different choices, and we should be responsible for the choices we make, and be ready for the consequences. This is a long journey, easy for others and frustrating to many; its not easy and we all knew that when applying. Everyone would love to have their app expedited. First come, first served saves us all in the end. Imagine having thousands of cases expedited and in the end creating unwanted back-loads and slowing down the process for everyone else.