1. No, you probably would have to re-apply.torontob said:Is it possible to re-open Super Visa TRV for re-consideration due to mistake?
Thanks,
Thanks for the reply.studypermitportal said:Yes you can. My rep did it for me.
Wouldn't it be easier and faster just to do as PMM said? TRVs are not like PR applications... they are way faster...torontob said:Thanks for the reply.
Can you please shed some light on the following:
1- How long did it take for the file to re-open?
2- How long did they take to process it?
3- Why did you chose to re-open? was it giving you better chances?
Also, can you please provide me your rep's number / name.
Thanks,
The officers got some info wrong and it can easily be explained in a re-opening. I would like to know all the options. Unfortunately, there are no statistics so either ways might be good to take but I would like to know all the options and other's experiences.Jalex23 said:Wouldn't it be easier and faster just to do as PMM said? TRVs are not like PR applications... they are way faster...
This is not that rare on TRV applications. What we usually suggest is to just file a new application adding this information to the explanation letter (and any other relevant support documentation). This is way smoother and faster than going through an appeal process and has much more rate of success that trying to show CIC made a mistake.torontob said:The officers got some info wrong and it can easily be explained in a re-opening.
All said are good reasons. I am wondering thought that by re-filing I take away the chance to ask to re-consider when they clearly made a mistake. Of course another officer can come up with a different which they happen to do all the time per this forum. I am considering refilling but I would like to know the time lines and for interest of everyone here it would be nice to know that approach as well. I would like to know if anyone can share their experience?Jalex23 said:This is not that rare on TRV applications. What we usually suggest is to just file a new application adding this information to the explanation letter (and any other relevant support documentation). This is way smoother and faster than going through an appeal process and has much more rate of success that trying to show CIC made a mistake.
The only benefit of having CIC "reconsider" is that you won't have to answer yes when asked "have you ever been refused a visa?".... which can be easily explained by "yes, not enough support documentation, but granted after second submission" and get on with your life.