This is the best post I have seen on this forum for some time, and to the point -PERIOD.slavasz said:Is Canada Worth It? Isn't it a rhetorical question? Is the number of applications not evidence?
In my humble opinion:
Global move of masses of people from places with fewer opportunities to places with more opportunities is inevitable and unavoidable.
Therefore, a smart government would let in more sought-after candidates first.
However, the barrier should be realistic. Obviously there are trade-offs.
If it is set too high (sure, Nobel laureates are preferred ), next thing you see all kind of people literally climbing over the fence. I mean literally, like from Mexico to the States. It is actually ridiculous to have more chance to win green-card with DV lottery than to get it being on H1-B already in the country.
It is very promising to see that the recent suggestions show opening of the immigration authorities' eyes .
No matter what education and experience you have the very first skills you need for Canada (or any other country for that matter) is LANGUAGE.
All those medical specialists driving taxis in Toronto could not (or would not, or did not want to) pass exam, first of all, because of inadequate level of language.
This is the biggest mistake you can make thinking "oh, it's OK, with experience and education when that person in Canada, he/she will improve his/her English/French here".
I would go so far to suggest making it mandatory:
Language (let's say English) – having less than 7 is not enough, so IELTS 7+ (for each part L-R-W-S), higher point for 8.5+, REGARDLESS of Academic or General Training. Canada will get people who speak very good English (or French).
And:
Education - high-school is not enough, at least Technical School or Bachelor, much higher point for PhD. Canada will get smarter people.
Experience - currently, at least one year and maximum for 4+, is adequate.
Further:
Age - minimum age 20, maximum points before 35, no points after 40. Canada will get people with enough years to earn pension.
Adaptability - for spouse the same minimum for language, education, experience and age, plus extra points for affidavit of support from at least 3 (maybe even 5, the more the better) people, anybody, not only relative. Canada will get people with spouses who will not be a drag to the main applicant. And will indirectly make sure the person will get well in Canada and not regret the move since those people know that person better than any immigration officer.
And:
Current list 29 without IT specialists is just nonsense. Let me repeat in other words- IT DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE.
Make it, maybe even 290 by including IT, all kind of hi-tech technicians, engineers and designers. Canada will get larger pull of specialists making even bigger advantage for manufacturing goods with higher added value. Otherwise sit and wait for India and China to do those products for you. Like those high-speed trains, for example.
Funds: the currents table is very realistic.
Another important detail: make decision making period of from one to two years. Not less than one year, to prevent people from making hasty decision. But not more than two, be humane. Let people plan their lives.
In conclusion - let my people go! (or actually come, to Canada )
Nothing much to add to it really, but then do "they" see it that way?
Frustrating, Why? - I applied when I was in my late 30's and now I am in 40's, and I am still waiting, and have even started thinking of pulling out after so many years.
What has the long wait brought me??????????????????????????????