+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

International Experience Canada-> Implied status-> LMO

on_line

Full Member
Feb 1, 2014
22
0
Hi,

I'm in Canada on Working Holidays I have open work permit.
My employer applyed for LMO but my work permit expire in two months.
Can I apply for new work permit before my old one expired and gain "Implied Status" based on LMO appication?. (Because I Implied not benefit from working holiday program)

Do someone knows what means this red statement?

E mail I got from cic

* Participants in international youth exchange programs (e.g., Student Work Abroad Program (SWAP), International Experience Canada (IEC) or Working Holiday Program (WHP)) do not benefit from implied status, unless extending a work permit not initially issued for the time limit authorized by the program.

cheers
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
95,816
22,097
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
There's no implied status for IEC. So if your new work permit isn't approved before your IEC expires, you will have to stop working until the new work permit is received.

What the statement in red means is the following: Let's say you were on an IEC visa for a year. Before it ended, your employer obtain an approved LMO and you obtained a new work permit. Let's say now that the second (non IEC) work permit is now near expiry. You have applied for a new (third) work permit but the new (third) work permit won't be recieved before the old work permit expires. In this case you have implied status because you applied for the third (non-IEC) work permit before the second (non-IEC) work permit expired. However since you're going from IEC to non-IEC you don't benefit from implied status.
 

on_line

Full Member
Feb 1, 2014
22
0
I called to CIC and they say me that if my employer apply for LMO I can get Implied Status even if I'm now on ICE OWP.
 

siat

Newbie
Mar 15, 2014
1
0
Hey there, I have a bad situacion with this IEC program, I am under the young professional program, when I came to Canada my employer had a some problems and lost contracts, so he doesn't have a really work for me, what supposed I have to do? Can I look for another job and change the employer? because is a close visa. What I need for changed it? Hope you can help me, I'm really desperate. Thank you!
 

Carlaganda23

Hero Member
Jan 8, 2014
590
8
Halifax Nova Scotia
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC-Mississauga
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
14-02-2014
AOR Received.
20-06-2014
Med's Done....
12-05-2015
LANDED..........
SA, AIP and DM May 21th, 2015 Landed: June 12, 2015
siat said:
Hey there, I have a bad situacion with this IEC program, I am under the young professional program, when I came to Canada my employer had a some problems and lost contracts, so he doesn't have a really work for me, what supposed I have to do? Can I look for another job and change the employer? because is a close visa. What I need for changed it? Hope you can help me, I'm really desperate. Thank you!
Hi,

Find for an employers who are willing to go through LMO process...Or apply IEC program again. You better shift to Visitors Visa after your IEC visa expires, so you will not get out of status...
 

ERPL

Full Member
Mar 30, 2014
36
1
Why do some people say that Implied Status doesn't work for IEC Visas? Does anyone has written proof? I keep calling CIC and they tell me that I can get Implied Status after a WHV if I apply for a Work Permit with LMO for example. I told them to send me a letter with this information but it seems like it is not written anywhere.

So that is why i wanna know why some people are so sure that you cannot get Implied Status with a IEC visa?
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
95,816
22,097
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
If you look through the old threads on this topic you'll see written proof from CIC confirming there is no implied status for IEC. The call centre has a tendency to give out wrong information for all but the most basic questions. For example, several people have been told you can't apply outland while in Canada. Extremely basic question (way more basic than implied status) - very very wrong answer.

The other proof we have seen is:

1) The person who received their PR visa but was then refused landing at the border due to illegal work (working after their IEC expired because they mistakenly thought they had implied status).

2) The person whose inland application was transferred to the local office for further examination and didn't receive AIP again due to illegal work (once again, thinking their was implied status with IECs).

CIC was very clear in both of the above cases that implied status does not apply for IEC. And keep in mind that these are the people making decisions about your file - not the call centre staff.

Ultimately it's your call.
 

ERPL

Full Member
Mar 30, 2014
36
1
scylla said:
If you look through the old threads on this topic you'll see written proof from CIC confirming there is no implied status for IEC. The call centre has a tendency to give out wrong information for all but the most basic questions. For example, several people have been told you can't apply outland while in Canada. Extremely basic question (way more basic than implied status) - very very wrong answer.

The other proof we have seen is:

1) The person who received their PR visa but was then refused landing at the border due to illegal work (working after their IEC expired because they mistakenly thought they had implied status).

2) The person whose inland application was transferred to the local office for further examination and didn't receive AIP again due to illegal work (once again, thinking their was implied status with IECs).

CIC was very clear in both of the above cases that implied status does not apply for IEC. And keep in mind that these are the people making decisions about your file - not the call centre staff.

Ultimately it's your call.
I see. Is there any way I can contact the CIC people that actually check the applications? Those 2 cases had problems when crossing the border, but If i apply for PR out land but I stay in canada as a visitor, I wouldn't have to go through the border to activate my PR, so my PR would activate automatically, is this correct? In that case I wouldnt have any problem if I was working under implied status in case it was not legal? A lawyer from this website called me today and assured me that I would get implied status, that is why I am still thinking... This is extremely confusing...
Thanks for your help scylla!
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
95,816
22,097
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
ERPL said:
I see. Is there any way I can contact the CIC people that actually check the applications? Those 2 cases had problems when crossing the border, but If i apply for PR out land but I stay in canada as a visitor, I wouldn't have to go through the border to activate my PR, so my PR would activate automatically, is this correct? In that case I wouldnt have any problem if I was working under implied status in case it was not legal? A lawyer from this website called me today and assured me that I would get implied status, that is why I am still thinking... This is extremely confusing...
Thanks for your help scylla!
No one gets implied status when applying outland (regardless of the type of work permit they are on). Implied status is available for inland applications only (and only for certain types of work permits).

If a lawyer told you that applying outland gives someone implied status then you should run in the opposite direction because that lawyer has absolutely no idea what he's talking about and is going to mess up your life.