- Jun 11, 2007
- 0
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Singapore
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 27-02-2014
- Med's Done....
- 13-02-2014
Hi gang,
It's been just about 8 months or so since I sponsored my Thai wife's visa application. I live in Thai atm with her and our two kids at her home in BKK. My sponsor application was initially approved by Mississauga when we sent in our application, confirmed via email along with a follow up confirmation from the Singapore office accepting responsibility for the applicant portion of the application. That all occurred within 4-5 weeks after sending our application to Mississauga instilling a good deal of confidence that things might well be smooth sailing from there as I was most worried about my status temporarily living abroad, sponsoring my wife's application.
So I am a little caught off guard now that the Singapore office sent my wife, copying myself, an email requesting:
The questions I am specifically wondering answers about include:
1) Why is Singapore concerning themselves with the sponsor, 8 months after the Mississauga approved the sponsor application? I am under the impression the sponsor's ability to adequately sponsor is dealt with immediately to better determine, both for the applicant-sponsor as well as IMM-CA, whether or not the applicant's more complex application need be forwarded to the appropriate office for what is the more time consuming process. Although I would not have met sponsor rejection by Mississauga with a smile 8 months ago, at least we would have made our decision for me to return at that point to Canada, as my wife and I had already discussed contingency plans in somewhat lengthy detail, rather than make what is sure to be a lengthy process even longer.
2) So I basically read the above request as: provide the requested support in 30 days or less or risk application rejection. If rejected based on the sponsor is the applicant's (lion's share) portion of the application fee refunded? I would sure hope so.
3) If I cannot satisfy the request quoted above and do not foresee realistically being able to do so, which was all explained and acknowledged in my 2 page declaration to begin with, so there should be no surprises here, except me wondering why this is being requested now, could a declaration on my part within 30 days to return to Canada to begin re-establishing myself keep the application in play, or do you think it will be rejected anyway?
4) If the application is rejected on sponsor details that I was under the impression were already acceptable to IMM-CA, otherwise why send confirmation approving sponsorship, is there any recourse that might be worth considering. Although I am inclined to think not, it couldn't hurt to throw it out there just in case.
5) Can we (my wife and I) respond via email with questions for further clarification, or does this sort of response need to be done via snail mail, or is there some other avenue. And should my wife respond for both of us since it is to her the email was addressed as I was only cc'd? I would certainly like to inquire, with a great deal of diplomatic restraint, as to why the sponsor portion of the application is being re-reviewed for reasons expressed above. I feel IMM-CA should be able to tell explain the basis for their concern regarding my sponsorship when Mississauga has already approved my sponsor application, hopefully without stepping on any toes or making matters worse.
Any advice or related, similar experience would be welcome reading before I respond to IMM-CA, especially if it could somehow help to allay my disappointed reaction.
It's been just about 8 months or so since I sponsored my Thai wife's visa application. I live in Thai atm with her and our two kids at her home in BKK. My sponsor application was initially approved by Mississauga when we sent in our application, confirmed via email along with a follow up confirmation from the Singapore office accepting responsibility for the applicant portion of the application. That all occurred within 4-5 weeks after sending our application to Mississauga instilling a good deal of confidence that things might well be smooth sailing from there as I was most worried about my status temporarily living abroad, sponsoring my wife's application.
So I am a little caught off guard now that the Singapore office sent my wife, copying myself, an email requesting:
Included with my sponsor application was a 2 page detailed letter explaining my situation and intentions. Other than that, and a letter from my mother inviting us to live with her at her house for as long as it takes for us to get our bearings, I have nothing more I can provide to satisfy the reqyest quoted above.The following additional supporting documentations are required from your sponsor in 30 days:-
þ evidence of his return to Canada
þ evidence of his establishment there like job offer, employment letter, etc
The questions I am specifically wondering answers about include:
1) Why is Singapore concerning themselves with the sponsor, 8 months after the Mississauga approved the sponsor application? I am under the impression the sponsor's ability to adequately sponsor is dealt with immediately to better determine, both for the applicant-sponsor as well as IMM-CA, whether or not the applicant's more complex application need be forwarded to the appropriate office for what is the more time consuming process. Although I would not have met sponsor rejection by Mississauga with a smile 8 months ago, at least we would have made our decision for me to return at that point to Canada, as my wife and I had already discussed contingency plans in somewhat lengthy detail, rather than make what is sure to be a lengthy process even longer.
2) So I basically read the above request as: provide the requested support in 30 days or less or risk application rejection. If rejected based on the sponsor is the applicant's (lion's share) portion of the application fee refunded? I would sure hope so.
3) If I cannot satisfy the request quoted above and do not foresee realistically being able to do so, which was all explained and acknowledged in my 2 page declaration to begin with, so there should be no surprises here, except me wondering why this is being requested now, could a declaration on my part within 30 days to return to Canada to begin re-establishing myself keep the application in play, or do you think it will be rejected anyway?
4) If the application is rejected on sponsor details that I was under the impression were already acceptable to IMM-CA, otherwise why send confirmation approving sponsorship, is there any recourse that might be worth considering. Although I am inclined to think not, it couldn't hurt to throw it out there just in case.
5) Can we (my wife and I) respond via email with questions for further clarification, or does this sort of response need to be done via snail mail, or is there some other avenue. And should my wife respond for both of us since it is to her the email was addressed as I was only cc'd? I would certainly like to inquire, with a great deal of diplomatic restraint, as to why the sponsor portion of the application is being re-reviewed for reasons expressed above. I feel IMM-CA should be able to tell explain the basis for their concern regarding my sponsorship when Mississauga has already approved my sponsor application, hopefully without stepping on any toes or making matters worse.
Any advice or related, similar experience would be welcome reading before I respond to IMM-CA, especially if it could somehow help to allay my disappointed reaction.