Hello all,
I'm quite new on this forum, I've been extensively reading up on the Open work permit pilot program for partners, as well as the possibility of having implied status with permission to work (originating from an IEC work permit)
So far I've managed to find a lot of confusing statements and some very strong opinions arguing that you can/can't work under the implied status you would supposedly receive from IEC+ Work permit application via PR Sponsorship (mail-in inland partner sponsorship, with application for work permit included).
I'll start off by describing my current situation, and the answers I have personally received from CIC call centre agents and an immigration consultant.
I've been in Canada since end of February last year under IEC and am currently working. My employer agreed to start an LMIA procedure as soon as I started working. This past week we were informed that the LMIA was rejected on grounds of it being a more junior position.
Meanwhile, my girlfriend agreed to sponsor me for a PR application and so we mailed in a Common-Law sponsorship PR application along with an application for an open work permit on December 24th 2014. I was under the impression that this would grant me implied status and allow me to keep working. I made this assumption based on a CICNews article I had found on CICNews (not allowed to post a url it seems) as well as on a number of calls with the CIC call centre agents (I called the number printed on my IEC work permit). I've been in touch several times with CIC call centre agents, and every time I specifically asked if I would be allowed to keep working under my implied status based on the fact that I had applied for a new OWP and was currently on an IEC work permit.
However, during this last week I posted something about this on an IEC forum post on an unrelated forum and someone told me that I should stop working once my IEC work permit expires, because there is no implied status under IEC (his logic was: an IEC visa cannot be extended and implied status = a type of extension). This person also told me that, if I did continue to work it would be considered illegal and it could jeopardize my entire PR and OWP application. Naturally, this got me quite worried and so I called the CIC call center again. I carefully explained my situation to the agent (including my doubts that IEC could result in implied status), and asked the agent to verify this. The agent told me he was 99% sure that I would be allowed to continue to work under this implied status. But, because I expressed quite a bit of concern, he agreed to go and double check this for me, upon his return he assured me that I could continue to work under the implied status...
After all of this I came back and started reading through the forum here and found a number of conflicting replies, all of which have left me very confused.
From the OWP pilot program thread:
As you can see there's a variety of opinions and information going around the forum about this, my main problem is that I would like to get a definitive yes/no from some official instance.
I understand that some people say, well this is a non-extendable visa, and so you cannot get implied status. What confuses me about this is that people then (sometimes) go on to say that you could get implied visitor status under this program. This just makes no sense to me at all, as it seems to me that implied visitor status would also be considered an extension (if anything under a different category since you would go from TFW to visitor)...
I'm quite new on this forum, I've been extensively reading up on the Open work permit pilot program for partners, as well as the possibility of having implied status with permission to work (originating from an IEC work permit)
So far I've managed to find a lot of confusing statements and some very strong opinions arguing that you can/can't work under the implied status you would supposedly receive from IEC+ Work permit application via PR Sponsorship (mail-in inland partner sponsorship, with application for work permit included).
I'll start off by describing my current situation, and the answers I have personally received from CIC call centre agents and an immigration consultant.
I've been in Canada since end of February last year under IEC and am currently working. My employer agreed to start an LMIA procedure as soon as I started working. This past week we were informed that the LMIA was rejected on grounds of it being a more junior position.
Meanwhile, my girlfriend agreed to sponsor me for a PR application and so we mailed in a Common-Law sponsorship PR application along with an application for an open work permit on December 24th 2014. I was under the impression that this would grant me implied status and allow me to keep working. I made this assumption based on a CICNews article I had found on CICNews (not allowed to post a url it seems) as well as on a number of calls with the CIC call centre agents (I called the number printed on my IEC work permit). I've been in touch several times with CIC call centre agents, and every time I specifically asked if I would be allowed to keep working under my implied status based on the fact that I had applied for a new OWP and was currently on an IEC work permit.
However, during this last week I posted something about this on an IEC forum post on an unrelated forum and someone told me that I should stop working once my IEC work permit expires, because there is no implied status under IEC (his logic was: an IEC visa cannot be extended and implied status = a type of extension). This person also told me that, if I did continue to work it would be considered illegal and it could jeopardize my entire PR and OWP application. Naturally, this got me quite worried and so I called the CIC call center again. I carefully explained my situation to the agent (including my doubts that IEC could result in implied status), and asked the agent to verify this. The agent told me he was 99% sure that I would be allowed to continue to work under this implied status. But, because I expressed quite a bit of concern, he agreed to go and double check this for me, upon his return he assured me that I could continue to work under the implied status...
After all of this I came back and started reading through the forum here and found a number of conflicting replies, all of which have left me very confused.
From the OWP pilot program thread:
JamesDavid, no reason to argue , you are right, it is boring. The four months processing times are for new applications, let's hope you get yours anytime soon and you can change employers and everybody will know that applying to change comditions of your stay allows you to comtinue working under the same comditions of your previous work permir as you did NOT request an extension of your IEC wp BUT an open work permit.
Just in case anyone was wondering, according to the multiple agents I have spoken to at CIC, the IEC program counts as eligible for Implied Status under this new pilot program.
I was skeptical because in August 2014 I sent an IMM5710E online after having sent off my inland spousal visa, and it was promptly refused. I was rejected on the grounds that 'IEC UK does not qualify as a work permit eligible for extension or implied status', it seems that they've now changed their minds (wish I could get my $155 back).
I've been worried that, since I only sent my IMM5710E and payment yesterday, and my current IEC visa expires February 1st, that I wouldn't have time to receive the OWP, but apparently this doesn't matter given implied status.
It seems strange to me that you receive no documentation at all for Implied Status, it's causing some concern from my employer since I told them that I was going to have to quit Feb 1st and now all of a sudden I am saying something else and I have no government issued documentation to support my legal status to work here.
Has anyone been through this before and managed to get documentation to prove their implied status to their employer?
Note that the CIC call centre agents are very well known for giving inaccurate information when it comes to IEC visa and implied status. I would not trust anything they say on the topic.
Go by the response you got from the actual visa officer that initially rejected your work permit extension, and assume IEC still does not qualify you for implied status. To be safe, you should stop working when your IEC visa expires, and wait until you get OWP under new pilot program before you begin working again.
They haven't changed their minds. Your first permit was rightly refused because you sent it online and separately from your inland app; CIC processed it immediately as a work permit extension instead of holding it for processing as an OWP attached to an inland PR app. Had you sent a paper app with a note explaining that you'd submitted an inland PR app and the OWP was to be processed after AIP, it wouldn't have been refused. They would have held it and processed it after AIP (or processed it now with the pilot program).
Though submitting the OWP app prior to your IEC expiring will give you Implied Status allowing you to stay in Canada, you cannot continue working when your IEC expires and before you receive the OWP. CIC does not provide proof of Implied Status.
As long as you submit PR application and OWP same time and CIC received the applications before Feb 7, you would be on "implied status" as a work visa until OWP is granted. However the "implied status" does not grant you "implied status" to keep working if you have IEC visa. If you have IEC, you only have "implied status" as a visitor until OWP is approved. Remember the "implied status" only applies to period after your visa expires.
If you have PGWP visa, technically you are not suppose to continue working under "implied status" as it is not extendable. However PGWP is linked to OWP through CEC process. Not through PR spousal sponsorship not the same process. So I reserve my judgement on whether PGWP also get "implied status" to work until otherwise proven.
As you can see there's a variety of opinions and information going around the forum about this, my main problem is that I would like to get a definitive yes/no from some official instance.
I understand that some people say, well this is a non-extendable visa, and so you cannot get implied status. What confuses me about this is that people then (sometimes) go on to say that you could get implied visitor status under this program. This just makes no sense to me at all, as it seems to me that implied visitor status would also be considered an extension (if anything under a different category since you would go from TFW to visitor)...