Mate IRCC has clear guidelines on the burden of the roles, responsibilities, titles, and even the exclusions for Teer0 or any Teer in fact.
I and another person have tried to educate you on the stringent norms for Teer0 and have advised you that Teer0 qualifies only for the CEO, board, or their reports.
You are the one talking about wages, and I don't agree that having a wage in that range on the website qualifies you.
I'm familiar with salary within the industry standards website that you posted because I fix to a lot of folks I recruit at work for Teer1 & 2 employees either with LMIA or exempt via ICTs. Yes I also use and it is only a benchmark most real-world wages are often higher
https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/trend-analysis/search-wages
But since you were so passionate, I searched for a CEO pay I can only laugh at the wages for Teer0 CEOs in Canada make as low as 27 PH to a median of 42 to a high of 97$ PH, and the highest converts to 190k which can be less than what I make if I include 100% of my bonus if I'm successful. Thousands to tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of us on WPs who make such pay or even above. Definitely, no CEO or Board member makes such low wages.
Also if pay was the criteria to qualify for a Teer0 job, then a lot more folks would have qualified for Teer0. It is not the case as advised to me by renowned immigration firm attorneys nor have I seen in this forum anywhere online of anyone being successful in claiming those Teer0 200 points without satisfying the the burden of the roles, responsibilities, and titles for Teer0 that IRCC has on the website
https://noc.esdc.gc.ca/Structure/NocProfile?objectid=iozOh0j9me9E4YGUx808lfYj9Hp8JZeueuhwa9urfo0=
My advice is please don't go with such low standards thinking you are eligible for Teer 0. Of course, you are welcome to try claiming the 200 points because you might make above 190k and if you succeed you can come back and post it here and I shall leave this forum and not offer any more voluntary advice.