I'm the type of guy who takes things literally, especially when it comes to documents created by the Government of Canada.
IMM3902 Appendix A
Document Checklist - Immigrant
IF ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS LISTED BELOW ARE MISSING, YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED (bold)
Now that statement seems pretty clear cut to me.
No if's, and's or but's.
It doesn't say "might be returned" or "may be returned" or "in some circumstances may be returned"
or "in most circumstances will be returned" etc.
It's cut and dry.
Now let's fast forward to the Medical Examination(s)
[Meds] and the Police Certificate(s) [PC].
I have read many posts where people have mailed in their Meds and PC after they have mailed in their initial application.
I'm not talking about doing this after a request was made by Imm. Canada for supplementing the initial Meds and PC. I mean sending in your application, not having included either your Meds or PC, or both included.
If Imm. Can. accepts these applications, and I assume they do, otherwise people wouldn't be talking about doing so, how is that possible?
How can Imm. Can. state one clear policy and then completely ignore it, even for "special circumstances"?
IMM3902 Appendix A
Document Checklist - Immigrant
IF ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS LISTED BELOW ARE MISSING, YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED (bold)
Now that statement seems pretty clear cut to me.
No if's, and's or but's.
It doesn't say "might be returned" or "may be returned" or "in some circumstances may be returned"
or "in most circumstances will be returned" etc.
It's cut and dry.
Now let's fast forward to the Medical Examination(s)
[Meds] and the Police Certificate(s) [PC].
I have read many posts where people have mailed in their Meds and PC after they have mailed in their initial application.
I'm not talking about doing this after a request was made by Imm. Canada for supplementing the initial Meds and PC. I mean sending in your application, not having included either your Meds or PC, or both included.
If Imm. Can. accepts these applications, and I assume they do, otherwise people wouldn't be talking about doing so, how is that possible?
How can Imm. Can. state one clear policy and then completely ignore it, even for "special circumstances"?