Hi Missmini, I didn't mean your answer was complicated! Sorrymissmini said:ooh i'm sorry if it sounded complicated, the thing is once u sent and u managed to organize it somehow it looks clear after LoLbut i know that once u have all the proofs laying around everywhere it's not easy to actually decide how to organize especially since the same checklist might refer to the same proofs in different parts of it and it's hard to decide what should go where....that's why peli's thread is a gem especially cuz it has pictures
...i don't think there's the perfect way in doing it, just follow their instructions (no binders etc) and try to make sure they have a clear idea what's included in the package and where they could find it....don't repeat urself and try to have a header on each page with some number, ur names and a title (or at least on as many pages as possible)
but i'm happy u start to get a better picture abt how u'll do itme too i think that toc's, indexes r very important and also outlines or short description for each groups of proofs if needed....don't leave anything unanswered or in doubt...
and yeah i remember now that at the sponsor side that common law paper was in case there's a co-signer so better include it in the applicant side, as u said
![]()
And I agree, this thread is awesome and the pics are SO helpful!