This was the number in last 2 weeks. Let's see what is going to happen in next 2 weeks.ajithj said:It is not an assumption, we know that 3800 new candidates entered the pool with 420+ scores in the last 2 weeks.
This was the number in last 2 weeks. Let's see what is going to happen in next 2 weeks.ajithj said:It is not an assumption, we know that 3800 new candidates entered the pool with 420+ scores in the last 2 weeks.
ajithj said:Every 2 weeks there are around 3800 candidates added with score above 420, this is same as the number of invitations sent out. So the scores will not drop below 420.
Below is the calculation:
April 19th draw - cutoff score was 415, all candidates with score 415 and above invited
- Now there are 0 candidates in the pool with score above 415
May 4th draw - Cutoff score of 423 and 3796 candidates invited.
So this means that in the two weeks between April 19th and May 4th, 3796 new candidates were added with score above 423.
even after 3796 invitations, total number of people in pool fell by about 600 indicating people from within the pool improved their scores or got PNP 600 points.
The assumption that the spike in 451-600 range was due to university/masters grads do not seem to be true. Because university grads graduate at different periods in a year. Also they complete their 1 year experience at different times of the year.
Total revenue that Ontario can get from PNP is a grand total of 3 million dollars in a year. contrast this against 597 billion state GDP last year.novascotia27 said:You also didn't account for the fact that MANY candidates in the express entry profile are making it to the ONE-year work experience in Canada that adds 50+ points depending on your level of English. Personally, I've just earned skilled Canadian work experience (12-months) few days ago and updated my EE profile. CRS score jumped from 410 to 494 points! I'm so excited and ready to receive the long-awaited invitation to apply email.
Another reason it may not go below 400 or even 410 is because of the fact that many provinces like Ontario, a major player in the Canadian Immigration System, have programs such as the "Human Capital Priorities Stream", which selects candidates who achieved 400+ points in their EE Profile for Provincial Nomination. This program is a revenue maker for Ontario as each applicant pays around $1,500 CAD to be nominated by the province. Therefore, rounds of invitations below 400 or 410 is a conflict of interest between the Federal Government and individual provinces as it undermines their role in the immigration system and cuts back the funding for their Provincial Nominee Program.
Hence, as much as Canada loves new skilled immigrants, it is worth considering the business-side of the Canadian Immigration System as they're a source of funding and incentives for Provinces to create/maintain and innovate their individual immigration programs.
Regards!
So are you saying the entire Ontario's GDP is based solely on Immigration then? It is completely foolish to attribute an entire province's GDP to Ontario's Department of Immigration rate of nomination. Ontario's total GDP involves a lot more than just the new number of immigrants so both things are not comparable at all.monavy said:Total revenue that Ontario can get from PNP is a grand total of 3 million dollars in a year. contrast this against 597 billion state GDP last year.
notion that provinces need PNP for revenue is plain bullshit.
novascotia27 said:So are you saying the entire Ontario's GDP is based solely on Immigration then? It is completely foolish to attribute an entire province's GDP to Ontario's Department of Immigration rate of nomination. Ontario's total GDP involves a lot more than just the new number of immigrants so both things are not comparable at all.
In addition and in case you don't know, OINP is a self-funded program, like many other provinces, and it heavily relies on per applicant profit margin to sustain itself; run and innovate its programs.Thus, what would be the incentive then for Provinces to invest in PNPs when the Federal Government is just inviting whomever they want? What would be your incentive to apply for Ontario's PNP, pay $1,500, if you know you will be nominated with a 405 CRS score? None! This is why CRS score may not go lower than what it did. You should definitely do more research before posting any comments on this website where hundreds of people are reading and possibly seeking a reasonable and educated information.
You need to improve your reading skills bro.
read again my response, calm down and then reply back.
Hi, can I ask you a question please?ajithj said:There were 3796 candidates with 423+ scores added in 2 weeks (between April 19th and May 4th). Doesn't this mean the scores will always remain constant around 420 unless IRCC increases the number of invitations in each round?
The score had dropped to 415 on April 19th only because there were draws on consecutive weeks. The score went back to 423 when there was a gap of two weeks between the draws.
i will use your argument to prove your opposite claim. you are the perfect example that last score rise is only temp.novascotia27 said:You also didn't account for the fact that MANY candidates in the express entry profile are making it to the ONE-year work experience in Canada that adds 50+ points depending on your level of English. Personally, I've just earned skilled Canadian work experience (12-months) few days ago and updated my EE profile. CRS score jumped from 410 to 494 points! I'm so excited and ready to receive the long-awaited invitation to apply email.
Another reason it may not go below 400 or even 410 is because of the fact that many provinces like Ontario, a major player in the Canadian Immigration System, have programs such as the "Human Capital Priorities Stream", which selects candidates who achieved 400+ points in their EE Profile for Provincial Nomination. This program is a revenue maker for Ontario as each applicant pays around $1,500 CAD to be nominated by the province. Therefore, rounds of invitations below 400 or 410 is a conflict of interest between the Federal Government and individual provinces as it undermines their role in the immigration system and cuts back the funding for their Provincial Nominee Program.
Hence, as much as Canada loves new skilled immigrants, it is worth considering the business-side of the Canadian Immigration System as they're a source of funding and incentives for Provinces to create/maintain and innovate their individual immigration programs.
Regards!
Monavy is trying to say say the same thing... you have mis quoted or misunderstoodnovascotia27 said:So are you saying the entire Ontario's GDP is based solely on Immigration then? It is completely foolish to attribute an entire province's GDP to Ontario's Department of Immigration rate of nomination. Ontario's total GDP involves a lot more than just the new number of immigrants so both things are not comparable at all.
In addition and in case you don't know, OINP is a self-funded program, like many other provinces, and it heavily relies on per applicant profit margin to sustain itself; run and innovate its programs.Thus, what would be the incentive then for Provinces to invest in PNPs when the Federal Government is just inviting whomever they want? What would be your incentive to apply for Ontario's PNP, pay $1,500, if you know you will be nominated with a 405 CRS score? None! This is why CRS score may not go lower than what it did. You should definitely do more research before posting any comments on this website where hundreds of people are reading and possibly seeking a reasonable and educated information.
Sorry to disappoint you, but you aren't seeing the real picture. Here is the data and analysis, if you can get it.GOOD NEWS! The score will definitely go below 400 soon!
Here is why:
- I have been doing a lot of calculations using the last three stats released about the number of candidates in the pool and their scores
- Felt like it was not sufficient data for predicting the trend over the next rounds
- I found out that they released the same data about the pool as of 3/Jan/2017 in their Year-End Report 2016
- I used that to predict the next few rounds, given the average number of candidates added per day over the last 4 months
- The results [taking into account the changes they introduce mid June]:
- Conservative estimate: CRS goes under 400 on July 26
- Regular estimate: CRS goes under 400 on July 5 (Likely Scenario)
- Optimistic estimate: CRS goes under 400 on June 21
- You can see the trend in the pool since January here: imgur.com/kEvDIzZ (This makes it really clear!)
- Some of my calculations: imgur.com/a/SatZC
All my predictions are based on the assumption that they will continue taking an average of 3700+ candidates every two weeks. I didn't know about the 73,700 target. However, I don't think that will change anything in the near term, it might change the number of candidates they take later in the year (October-ish)Sorry to disappoint you, but you aren't seeing the real picture. Here is the data and analysis, if you can get it.
Total target for 2017 EE : 73,700
ITAs given in first 4 months Jan-April 2017 : 35,973
Which mean almost half of the required target is already issued. (of course how many will accept the ITAs and get PRs can be ignored for the moment)
Now, with 8 more months to go, no one from outside of the department knows how many they would invite every month.
Now let's look at the data.
On April 7th there were 10139 in the pool with above 400 CRS
On April 28th there were 8314 in the pool with above 400 CRS
From April 7th till April 28th there were 2 rounds of invitation which were above 400.
One on April 12th with 3,923 ITAs
Another in Apr 19th with 3665 ITAS
Totaling 7588
Which means From April 7th till April 28th 7,588 were out from pool because they were given ITAs.
Which means 10139-7588 = 2551 are remained in the pool since April 7th till April 28 as they were not given ITAs as they were less than 415 CRS (lowest invite).
Here, if you notice, there were 8314 in the pool on April 28th with above 400 CRS. Which implies that 8314-2551 = 5763 where added to pool with 400+ score between April 7th and April 28th. Which is 3 weeks. So, about 1921 were added per week.
That means about 1900 are being added to the pool with CRS 400+ per WEEK... so even if they have to invite every 2 weeks they will have a fresh 3800 people being added with 400+ score.
And, you are dreaming for CRS invitation rounds to go less than 400.
You need to look at historical data, not just one round. A spike in one round could be an outlier, no matter what the reason is. I calculated the average over the last 4 months.Every 2 weeks there are around 3800 candidates added with score above 420, this is same as the number of invitations sent out. So the scores will not drop below 420.
Below is the calculation:
April 19th draw - cutoff score was 415, all candidates with score 415 and above invited
- Now there are 0 candidates in the pool with score above 415
May 4th draw - Cutoff score of 423 and 3796 candidates invited.
So this means that in the two weeks between April 19th and May 4th, 3796 new candidates were added with score above 423.
The assumption that the spike in 451-600 range was due to university/masters grads do not seem to be true. Because university grads graduate at different periods in a year. Also they complete their 1 year experience at different times of the year.
Actually they have to fill the 2017 quota by September/October so 5-6 months are still left.Sorry to disappoint you, but you aren't seeing the real picture. Here is the data and analysis, if you can get it.
Total target for 2017 EE : 73,700
ITAs given in first 4 months Jan-April 2017 : 35,973
Which mean almost half of the required target is already issued. (of course how many will accept the ITAs and get PRs can be ignored for the moment)
Now, with 8 more months to go, no one from outside of the department knows how many they would invite every month.
Now let's look at the data.
On April 7th there were 10139 in the pool with above 400 CRS
On April 28th there were 8314 in the pool with above 400 CRS
From April 7th till April 28th there were 2 rounds of invitation which were above 400.
One on April 12th with 3,923 ITAs
Another in Apr 19th with 3665 ITAS
Totaling 7588
Which means From April 7th till April 28th 7,588 were out from pool because they were given ITAs.
Which means 10139-7588 = 2551 are remained in the pool since April 7th till April 28 as they were not given ITAs as they were less than 415 CRS (lowest invite).
Here, if you notice, there were 8314 in the pool on April 28th with above 400 CRS. Which implies that 8314-2551 = 5763 where added to pool with 400+ score between April 7th and April 28th. Which is 3 weeks. So, about 1921 were added per week.
That means about 1900 are being added to the pool with CRS 400+ per WEEK... so even if they have to invite every 2 weeks they will have a fresh 3800 people being added with 400+ score.
And, you are dreaming for CRS invitation rounds to go less than 400.
Let me explain why historical data cannot be used to analyze the trend for scores below 430.You need to look at historical data, not just one round. A spike in one round could be an outlier, no matter what the reason is. I calculated the average over the last 4 months.