Help!!Be questioned for misrepresentation by Visa officer

[ellepp]

Dear all

I am in big trouble. I am questioned by visa officer for misrepresentation.

My noc code is 0631 and now in great danger.

The evidences VO declared in hand were obtained from a site visit. However, these evidences are totally wrong by nature. The VO said I am not a management level person, but in truth I am, I have mounts of working documents to verify my management experience, VO also said I have duties of ABCD but I never done these things before.

VO claimed to have spoke to HR to verified my duties as 1234...but HR denied he had ever told them like that and willing to offer me written statement for my arguement. VO even said I confirmed my duties as 1234, but during that site visit I spoke nothing about duties. The evidences VO claimed should be questioned greatly!

The officer is now giving me an opportunity to explain. I wonder if it's manner to show their fairness in procedure, even if I submit solid evidences they also can refuse me for misrepresentation? Or if I submit solid evidences to support my claim they will lift this concern?

Is there anyone who has the similar experience before but finally success? I need help, advice and experience sharing of every kind!!

 

[ellepp]

up!

 

[lhr_montreal]

up!

Explain with evidences. Dont panic and best of luck

 

[thebeast184]

Hi,

Sorry to hear this. Couple of questions:

1) Reading your past history it seems you had no proof of taxes, etc given that you where paid in cash, what types of proof in addition to the letters did you submit?
2) Did they do a site visit?
3) What country do you live, did you work on the same country?
3) What is your VO?

I am just trying to get more insight to comment.

Rod

Rod

Dear all

I am in big trouble. I am questioned by visa officer for misrepresentation.

My noc code is 0631 and now in great danger.

The evidences VO declared in hand were obtained from a site visit. However, these evidences are totally wrong by nature. The VO said I am not a management level person, but in truth I am, I have mounts of working documents to verify my management experience, VO also said I have duties of ABCD but I never done these things before.

VO claimed to have spoke to HR to verified my duties as 1234...but HR denied he had ever told them like that and willing to offer me written statement for my arguement. VO even said I confirmed my duties as 1234, but during that site visit I spoke nothing about duties. The evidences VO claimed should be questioned greatly!

The officer is now giving me an opportunity to explain. I wonder if it's manner to show their fairness in procedure, even if I submit solid evidences they also can refuse me for misrepresentation? Or if I submit solid evidences to support my claim they will lift this concern?

Is there anyone who has the similar experience before but finally success? I need help, advice and experience sharing of every kind!!

 

[ellepp]

1. I had taxes proof as well as social insurance as evidences been submit.
2.Yes
3. Hongkong, yes
4. Hongkong

 

[qorax]

Dear all

I am in big trouble. I am questioned by visa officer for misrepresentation.

My noc code is 0631 and now in great danger.

The evidences VO declared in hand were obtained from a site visit. However, these evidences are totally wrong by nature. The VO said I am not a management level person, but in truth I am, I have mounts of working documents to verify my management experience, VO also said I have duties of ABCD but I never done these things before.

VO claimed to have spoke to HR to verified my duties as 1234...but HR denied he had ever told them like that and willing to offer me written statement for my arguement. VO even said I confirmed my duties as 1234, but during that site visit I spoke nothing about duties. The evidences VO claimed should be questioned greatly!

The officer is now giving me an opportunity to explain. I wonder if it's manner to show their fairness in procedure, even if I submit solid evidences they also can refuse me for misrepresentation? Or if I submit solid evidences to support my claim they will lift this concern?

Is there anyone who has the similar experience before but finally success? I need help, advice and experience sharing of every kind!!

My Assumptions:
1. Ur IO had a visit of ur working location;
2. U were present & were spoken with;
3. Ur Manager-HR was present & was also spoken with;
4. The IO might have observed u working;
5. The IO might have assessed the complete working atmosphere;
6. S/he might also have spoken with others.

My Opinion:
1. Probably ur IO noticed an/y anomaly in the entire work processes;
2. Probably s/he also found distorted responses between u & ur Manager-HR;
3. Probably s/he didn't notice/observe u in a decision making role [in ur org];
4. Probably there was something 'lost in translation', or a misconception;
5. Probably, his/her perception of the 'works' was conjured improperly;

My Take:
If u have serious grounds [with documentary evidences] to support ur claim, which is contrary to his/her opinion - u should & can contest it, and here's ur chance. Make a suave response, attach as much info/evidences that u can & humbly request him/her to reconsider. Explain ur duties once again. Attach that letter [which ur Manager-HR intends to issue u] and clarify ur IO's doubts.

End Note:
There's no harm in trying. Do ur best. U have the opportunity... make a good use of it.

All the best.
Qorax

 

[harry_aussie]

I am a fairness letter survivor. PM me regarding the doubts.

 

[ellepp]

My Assumptions:
1. Ur IO had a visit of ur working location; Yes
2. U were present & were spoken with; Yes, for less than 5 minutes
3. Ur Manager-HR was present & was also speoken with;Yes for about half an hour
4. The IO might have observed u working;Almost not, when IO saw me, IO spoke with me and I stopped my work in hand.
5. The IO might have assessed the complete working atmosphere; Maybe, but 5 mins isnt adequate
6. S/he might also have spoken with others.No. In the letter, VO claimed to have spoke with HR, not mentioned the others.

My Opinion:
1. Probably ur IO noticed an/y anomaly in the entire work processes; No.Time is to short IO could barely witnessed any process.
2. Probably s/he also found distorted responses between u & ur Manager-HR; According to their claim Yes. But HR denied. 3. Probably s/he didn't notice/observe u in a decision making role [in ur org]; 5 mins isnt adequate 4. Probably there was something 'lost in translation', or a misconception; Accroding to HR,yes
5. Probably, his/her perception of the 'works' was conjured improperly;Maybe

My Take:

If u have serious grounds [with documentary evidences] to support ur claim, which is contrary to his/her opinion - u should & can contest it, and here's ur chance. Make a suave response, atach as much info/evidences that u can & humbly request him/her to reconsider. Explain ur duties once again. Attach that letter [which ur Manager-HR intends to issue u] and clarify ur IO's doubts.

End Note:
There's no harm in trying. Do ur best. U have the opportunity... make a good use of it.

All the best.
Qorax

 

[ellepp]

uuup

 

[srid_a]

@ellepp

Think hard. Try to name the people who report to you or, people you have interviewed and hired or, the memos you have written or, the decisions you have made as a manager. In addition to HR, try to see if your boss can provide something on your behalf.

Find out what exactly the HR person was asked and what responses were given. Prepare thoroughly. Goodluck!

 

[ellepp]

@ ellepp

Think hard. Try to name the people who report to you or, people you have interviewed and hired or, the memos you have written or, the decisions you have made as a manager. In addition to HR, try to see if your boss can provide something on your behalf.

Find out what exactly the HR person was asked and what responses were given. Prepare thoroughly. Goodluck!

Many thanks. Their comments on the letter were majorly not stated by HR on that day, which HR can issue a statement for it.

I suppose they based on their observations on that day. However, they had only for max 10mins been with me and at that time I was talking to them not working on anything, I do not know what they could observe and lead to a conclusion, it is too subjective! too unfair for me

 

[manila07]

did you get IP in your e-cas before they did the site visit?

 

[ellepp]

did you get IP in your e-cas before they did the site visit?

No

 

[dnyfyn]

Ok my view.

No worries first. Calm down.

They may have visited you or may not. I have seen lot of people around getting claims by VO that they have checked a list of activities.

However in the end at the interview they cross check and you go ready to explain each situation.

Carry few documents to show your decision making process.

 

[dnyfyn]

Follow this

http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/false-claim-by-officer-t99357.0.html

It might help you as well