GCMS Status :Review Required ( Help urgent)

[richi jolly]

Ya, i have talk to my lawyer and will be working on it soon hopefully by the end of this week.
TO AJ1234 - how long do they take to update the letter, do they make a decision right away and how long did it take for you application .

 

[richi jolly]

TO PB 02
Thanks for replying .. just a quick question. when were you in the same situation and did you send them another updated letter(email or post mail the hard copy) and when did you get your medical. i am really scared but i think if they were gonna reject my case then they would have done it but holding my file and asking for another review looks kinda positive . even i ask couple of friends and they suggested its not a big thing to scared about but the chances are 50 -50.... i will send them another letter by this friday nov 1 so lets hope for the best.. e

 

[waitinginvaincec]

I just got an email from immigration this morning acknowledging the receipt of my letter and documents. i hope everything works well.

 

[richi jolly]

TO waitinginvaincec
SO I HAVE A QUESTION DID YOU EMAIL OR POST MAIL THEM THE NEW LETTER. AND WAS IT CURRENT DATED OR YOU JUST AMEND THE PREVIOUS LETTER AND MAIL THEM ...

 

[waitinginvaincec]

TO waitinginvaincec
SO I HAVE A QUESTION DID YOU EMAIL OR POST MAIL THEM THE NEW LETTER. AND WAS IT CURRENT DATED OR YOU JUST AMEND THE PREVIOUS LETTER AND MAIL THEM ...

i emailed it, what i did is, i removed the duty that they are questioning and rephrased it. for the rest, i still used it, however i expounded each duty. and i also included other docs like work permits, noa and pay stubs as they are questioning my eligibility. after three days i got the confirmation saying that they have included the letter i sent with my application.

 

[richi jolly]

i emailed it, what i did is, i removed the duty that they are questioning and rephrased it. for the rest, i still used it, however i expounded each duty. and i also included other docs like work permits, noa and pay stubs as they are questioning my eligibility. after three days i got the confirmation saying that they have included the letter i sent with my application.

OK THANKS ! I AM GONNA SEE MY LAWYER SOON SO SHOULD I CHANGE THE DATE .. THE PERVIOUS LETTER WAS DATED 20 NOV 2012 ON IT SO SHOULD HAVE THE SAME DATE OR PUT THE CURRENT ONE ON THE NEW LETTER

 

[richi jolly]

i emailed it, what i did is, i removed the duty that they are questioning and rephrased it. for the rest, i still used it, however i expounded each duty. and i also included other docs like work permits, noa and pay stubs as they are questioning my eligibility. after three days i got the confirmation saying that they have included the letter i sent with my application.

AND DID YOU GET YOUR EMPLOYER TO SIGN THE LETTER .. I WAS THINKING TO EDIT THE LETTER WITH CURRENT DATE AND SCAN AND THEN EMAIL THEM.. WHAT YOU THINK.. COZ IF I EMAIL THEM ON THE COMANY LETTER HEAD IT WILL LOOK MORE PROFESSIONAL

 

[arorkama]

FOSS/GCMS check: No adverse info. Temporary resident status authorized during CEC qualifying period.
NO VALID RESULTS IN GCMS
MEDICAL HISTORY Civil status: Married, spouse is accompanying, no children declared.
Work Experience: Assessed under
TFW stream, CEC qualifying period is: 05MAR-2010 to 26nov-2012.16NOV2010 to 22NOV2012, NOC 2174
DECLARED, F/T COMPUTER PROGRAMMER FOR ABC. Letter, dated 20NOV2012, confirms dates of employment, position title and salary of 35Klyr. Both a 201 1 T4 from this
employer and 2011 NOA show reported earnings of 31.5K. Letter provides a list of duties which appears to
partly correspond to NOC. Supporting docs appear sufficient to demonstrate required experience in this NOC
code. Language: IELTS submitted, meets benchmarks for work experience at this skill level. Education: The PA
has provided a transcript from Sheridan College, printed on 04MAR2009, showing that she is enrolled in
Enterprise Data Management. According to the transcript the program was "in progress" as of the Winter 2009
term. Criminality: PA RCMP Screening - NRT Docs received for PA and SPOUSE: Police clearances from
ABC City, India. No additional docs required at this time.


File Received By CIC: 26 NO 2012
Eligibility Status: Review Required


Any suggestions.

Thanks,

 

[CEC2013]

DECLARED, F/T COMPUTER PROGRAMMER FOR ABC. Letter, dated 20NOV2012, confirms dates of employment, position title and salary of 35Klyr. Both a 2011 T4 from this employer and 2011 NOA show reported earnings of 31.5K. Letter provides a list of duties which appears to
partly correspond to NOC. Supporting docs appear sufficient to demonstrate required experience in this NOC.
code.No additional docs required at this time.

Hmmm.... interesting read. First time I see that they say "partially corresponds to NOC" and then continue with "sufficient to demonstrate required experience". Did you send anything else other than reference letter to support experience?

Concern from what I can see here is the salary...reference letter says 35k, while your actual income is 31K. You should probably send an explanation why there is a difference in your reported income. NOC seems fine, Criminality fine, FOSS fine, admissibility - no particular comments, so fine. Yea, I think if you address your income, it should clear the next stage.

 

[iam_toby]

Hmmm.... interesting read. First time I see that they say "partially corresponds to NOC" and then continue with "sufficient to demonstrate required experience". Did you send anything else other than reference letter to support experience?

Concern from what I can see here is the salary...reference letter says 35k, while your actual income is 31K. You should probably send an explanation why there is a difference in your reported income. NOC seems fine, Criminality fine, FOSS fine, admissibility - no particular comments, so fine. Yea, I think if you address your income, it should clear the next stage.

I have a huge difference in NOA and letter as well, but just because I only worked for a few months in 2012. I did
not work for a full year in 2012 so my total annual income on the letter is not relecting on the NOA.

 

[CEC2013]

I have a huge difference in NOA and letter as well, but just because I only worked for a few months in 2012. I did
not work for a full year in 2012 so my total annual income on the letter is not relecting on the NOA.

Hm... Yea, see, this is not a problem, but you should probably explain. I think its more pro forma to know that you are not reporting less to get out of taxes, but rather that you did not work. So, I think an explanation letter would do the trick. Just to be on the safe side.

 

[iam_toby]

Hm... Yea, see, this is not a problem, but you should probably explain. I think its more pro forma to know that you are not reporting less to get out of taxes, but rather that you did not work. So, I think an explanation letter would do the trick. Just to be on the safe side.

That's what I did. Attached a letter explaining that and also my latest pay stub showing my year-to-date earnings
for the current year 2013.

 

[CEC2013]

That's what I did. Attached a letter explaining that and also my latest pay stub showing my year-to-date earnings
for the current year 2013.

I am really curious about this "partially corresponds to NOC" and then "sufficient to demonstrate experience". Puzzling me how this can be. Thoughts?

 

[spookyb]

I am really curious about this "partially corresponds to NOC" and then "sufficient to demonstrate experience". Puzzling me how this can be. Thoughts?

Well, most people don't do every duty listed in the NOC. My understanding is that a "substantial" number of duties need to correspond. What that number is is debatable. I recall a court precedence that it has to be 2 or more, but I'm not sure.

 

[CEC2013]

Well, most people don't do every duty listed in the NOC. My understanding is that a "substantial" number of duties need to correspond. What that number is is debatable. I recall a court precedence that it has to be 2 or more, but I'm not sure.

Fair enough. I guess I read it with a little more skepticism... But it makes sense that you cant have every single duty exactly the way they list it. Then people would just copy paste all the time.