GCMS of a friend ..

[Classical_beat]

sorry not accepted. if that was the case you should have asked for your self not friend

lol......your funny ... But who asked sorry huh ......... !!! ;D

 

[229334]

lol......your funny ... But who asked sorry huh ......... !!! ;D

lolz..........i meant, sorry, your excuse not accepted... ;D ;D

you got to learn my friend...

 

[Classical_beat]

lolz..........i meant, sorry, your excuse not accepted... ;D ;D

you got to learn my friend...

oh its ok !! I would love to learn ... ;D ;D

 

[229334]

oh its ok !! I would love to learn ... ;D ;D

+1..

 

[kochi]

One of my friend received his GCMS . There is one thing which Counterfoil Required : Yes

and at the end of the GCMS there is Notes ... Can anyone predict anything ??

Notes
Notes: 1
Created date : xxxxxx
Created by :xxxxxxxx
Updated date : xxxxxxx
Updated by : xxxxxxxx
Restricted : No
Label : Eligibility
Office : Singapore
Text : PA is claiming here experience as a xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxx company since xxxx . Both PA and spouse have master deg. PA has sufficient pts to pass. Interview waived.

Thanks for sharing. I want to apply through kenman. Ple write me detail it will be help for me. Thanks again.

 

[Classical_beat]

Thanks for sharing. I want to apply through kenman. Ple write me detail it will be help for me. Thanks again.

Go here http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t88238.0.html

 

[table]

When i order for GCMS via Canadian relative so would u tell me what kinds of documents he/she has to submit like bank statement or PR card?

 

[Classical_beat]

When i order for GCMS via Canadian relative so would u tell me what kinds of documents he/she has to submit like bank statement or PR card?

I actually don't know dear .. cos mine was ordered by someone else . so what he submitted only he knows.. you can always google search ...

 

[SABU79]

Hi,
This is very good information regarding gcms. I got my gcms and VO screened my file. VO also noted end of the report as you guys. One thing I am really worried about is that VO did not mention about 'interview waived' thing. Does it mean that I am likely to be called for interview? VO just mentioned in the last line 'File to review office'. Please share your views. Thank you.

 

[OhCanadiana]

Hi,
This is very good information regarding gcms. I got my gcms and VO screened my file. VO also noted end of the report as you guys. One thing I am really worried about is that VO did not mention about 'interview waived' thing. Does it mean that I am likely to be called for interview? VO just mentioned in the last line 'File to review office'. Please share your views. Thank you.

Did your notes mention anything about the points?

 

[SABU79]

Did your notes mention anything about the points?

Yes They did. I got 68 points by both CIC stage and VO. here is the note below. Please comment. Thank you.

PAPER SCREENINH NOTES: XXX (Name). FOSS – NAI.2121 BIOLOGIST AND RELATED SCIENTIST.2003 TO DATE. FOOD PRODUCT SCIENTIST, FOOD RESEARCH SCIENTIST, FOOD SCIENTIST, CITIZEN OF xxxxxx. RESIDENT IN THE UK SINCE 2005. SPOUSE RESIDENT UK SINCE 2010, DOCS NOTED. SCERT FOR PI, AND SP, BC FOR PI REG 2011. BC FOR SP, REG 2008. MC. 3-2010. E 12 VERIFIED. F NA EXTENSIVE STUDY DATES IN THE UK. 2000 BSC IN AGRICULTURE. PROVISIONAL CERT. 2009 MSC IN FOOD BIOSCIENCE FROM UK UNIVERSITY. PI STATES THERE IS A SLIGHT OVERLAP BETWEEN MASTERS AND EMPLOYMENT SUBMISSION AS HE WAS FINALISING THESIS. JULY 2011. ER CERT FROM xxxxxx(COMPANY NAME). MAY 2009 TO MAY 2011. RESEARCH SCIENTIST IN THE PRODUCT SUPPORT DIVISION. EXCELLENT RECOMMENDATION. COMPANY ENGAGED IN RESEARCH FOR FOOD SAFETY AND PLANT DISEASE . ADPT. NO REL IN CANADA. PCS UK. CLEAN 8-2011, XXXXX (COUNTRY NAME) PI CLEAN 2011. FUNDS (Bank name) = 7.00 cad xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bank and fund details).AGE 10 ED 25 EX 17 LE 12 AD 4 68* STUDY AND WORK HISTORY DATES DATES ARE VAGUE AND APPEAR TO INC STUDIES AT WHITECHAPEL COLLEGE. FLAGGED. A NUMBER OF YEARS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR*LICO CD 13,837 FILE TO REVIEW OFFICE

 

[Classical_beat]

Hi,
This is very good information regarding gcms. I got my gcms and VO screened my file. VO also noted end of the report as you guys. One thing I am really worried about is that VO did not mention about 'interview waived' thing. Does it mean that I am likely to be called for interview? VO just mentioned in the last line 'File to review office'. Please share your views. Thank you.

I think your one is still in the review stage so they didn't mention about interview thingy .. Mine is already In Process .

 

[OhCanadiana]

Yes They did. I got 68 points by both CIC stage and VO. here is the note below. Please comment. Thank you.

PAPER SCREENINH NOTES: XXX (Name). FOSS – NAI.2121 BIOLOGIST AND RELATED SCIENTIST.2003 TO DATE. FOOD PRODUCT SCIENTIST, FOOD RESEARCH SCIENTIST, FOOD SCIENTIST, CITIZEN OF xxxxxx. RESIDENT IN THE UK SINCE 2005. SPOUSE RESIDENT UK SINCE 2010, DOCS NOTED. SCERT FOR PI, AND SP, BC FOR PI REG 2011. BC FOR SP, REG 2008. MC. 3-2010. E 12 VERIFIED. F NA EXTENSIVE STUDY DATES IN THE UK. 2000 BSC IN AGRICULTURE. PROVISIONAL CERT. 2009 MSC IN FOOD BIOSCIENCE FROM UK UNIVERSITY. PI STATES THERE IS A SLIGHT OVERLAP BETWEEN MASTERS AND EMPLOYMENT SUBMISSION AS HE WAS FINALISING THESIS. JULY 2011. ER CERT FROM xxxxxx(COMPANY NAME). MAY 2009 TO MAY 2011. RESEARCH SCIENTIST IN THE PRODUCT SUPPORT DIVISION. EXCELLENT RECOMMENDATION. COMPANY ENGAGED IN RESEARCH FOR FOOD SAFETY AND PLANT DISEASE . ADPT. NO REL IN CANADA. PCS UK. CLEAN 8-2011, XXXXX (COUNTRY NAME) PI CLEAN 2011. FUNDS (Bank name) = 7.00 cad xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bank and fund details).AGE 10 ED 25 EX 17 LE 12 AD 4 68* STUDY AND WORK HISTORY DATES DATES ARE VAGUE AND APPEAR TO INC STUDIES AT WHITECHAPEL COLLEGE. FLAGGED. A NUMBER OF YEARS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR*LICO CD 13,837 FILE TO REVIEW OFFICE

That is a summary of the info that would yield the 68 points. Your file is going to be reviewed by the review office and they may come back and ask questions about your study and work history dates which the initial review deemed are vague with some years not accounted for. Take a look at the information you included in your application and, if you missed a few years and have gaps, consider sending an update of your application and an explanation of why you didn't include the information initially.

 

[SABU79]

That is a summary of the info that would yield the 68 points. Your file is going to be reviewed by the review office and they may come back and ask questions about your study and work history dates which the initial review deemed are vague with some years not accounted for. Take a look at the information you included in your application and, if you missed a few years and have gaps, consider sending an update of your application and an explanation of why you didn't include the information initially.

Thanks buddy, I have the answer. I graduated in September but my employment date is in May. I started working before my graduation. I provided a covering letter explaining to them.
Another question.. Whitechapel college.... I did a diploma course at this college but this college has been closed down. I included transcript of this course but I should not have. I got 68 points without this qualification.
Will I be ok ? Please help. thanks

 

[OhCanadiana]

Thanks buddy, I have the answer. I graduated in September but my employment date is in May. I started working before my graduation. I provided a covering letter explaining to them.
Another question.. Whitechapel college.... I did a diploma course at this college but this college has been closed down. I included transcript of this course but I should not have. I got 68 points without this qualification.
Will I be ok ? Please help. thanks

They saw your note and made mention of it. Check your other dates to make sure you don't have a typo - they do say "a number of years not accounted for."