Gathering statistics

[Hemi427]

Thanks. I'm still curious if there are any lower numbers. My guess is that numbering is continuous, but that it started from some big number, maybe E000215000 or something like that, so I'm trying to figure out what the starting number was.

You will never get the exact number... I however believe on your calculations with the generic numbers being E0002...and application number starting from 10000..so thats roughly 50000 till 11th Feb...Around 1000 applications per day...pheww!!!

 

[miltoncsekuet]

E000235000 at 5th january

 

[esantos]

E000250***

January-28-2015 06:17:02 PM EST

 

[EEKnowledge]

Well with your parameters, the prediction will have massive range of errors. Besides, how will you even model this much chaotic distribution; with no reliable data. Good luck with it though.

I think only way is to see CIC run its one year course, or even 6 months, the distribution will become easier to predict.

 

[chad_80]

Hi atmtaatmta,

Just curious over the results of your statistical model.. My ID is very close to yours submitted on Jan 2nd.

I am wondering if this post is true where it says that as of Jan 31st, there were only 3000 in the draw...

"The successful applicants, selected at the end of January, accounted for 26 per cent of an estimated 3,000 people who entered the draw for the federal government’s highly-touted Express Entry program."

 

[atmtaatmta]

Hi atmtaatmta,

Just curious over the results of your statistical model.. My ID is very close to yours submitted on Jan 2nd.

I am wondering if this post is true where it says that as of Jan 31st, there were only 3000 in the draw...

"The successful applicants, selected at the end of January, accounted for 26 per cent of an estimated 3,000 people who entered the draw for the federal government's highly-touted Express Entry program."

Because of the statement about 3000 I decided to wait a bit (a week or so) for more info from CIC. Another draw perhaps, or some other sort of clarification.
If there really were only 3000 profiles in pool, then our distribution in spreadsheet is very far from real and there is no way to predict anything based on it.
Still, I suspect, that there was an error and that it should be read as 30'000. That would be close to expectations.
Also, if there were only 3000 profiles, with two 779-people draws separated only by a week, it would mean, that more than half profiles are with jo-lmia/pnp. I just can't believe that.

 

[Beancounter]

E000264XXX

Profile created around 7pm EST 17th February 2015

Profile submitted around 8pm EST 17th February 2015

 

[canada7981]

Because of the statement about 3000 I decided to wait a bit (a week or so) for more info from CIC. Another draw perhaps, or some other sort of clarification.
If there really were only 3000 profiles in pool, then our distribution in spreadsheet is very far from real and there is no way to predict anything based on it.
Still, I suspect, that there was an error and that it should be read as 30'000. That would be close to expectations.
Also, if there were only 3000 profiles, with two 779-people draws separated only by a week, it would mean, that more than half profiles are with jo-lmia/pnp. I just can't believe that.

I would like to highlight that, chances of typo or any error can not be logged twice. Because, statement clearly stated, 26 % of 3000

"The successful applicants, selected at the end of January, accounted for 26 per cent of an estimated 3,000 people who entered the draw for the federal government's highly-touted Express Entry program.".

 

[atmtaatmta]

There might have been an error in information transmition prior to these 26% being calculated.
For instance, CIC tells a reporter, that there were 3000 people in the pool (zero is lost). Then the aticle author divides 779 by 3000 and thus calculates, that 26% were chosen for ITAs.

 

[jv7r]

Im a new person as a member.But Im benefited a lot becoz of this forum as this unites the whole world for good cause. hats off.Tons & tons of gratitudes to all the members for sharing .. spending their valuable times .thanks to new technological era...........

friends if canadian govt. is interested to invite people why it is becoming difficult to get LIMA jobs ?( as this equals the shortage of PR or canda citizens for skill A jobs)

Also while filling EE profile there is no Engineering..what should I fill?

please clarify....

 

[211]

Mine is E0003070** on March.30.

 

[Michau]

The account numbers are in no way an indication of how many EE profiles exist. They are just identifiers, and there is no guarantee that each identifier actually identifies an active EE profiles. The fact that they start not at 1 but at some very high number is a good indication that they might be some kind of "global identifiers", used for identifying many different things in the CIC system, EE profiles being only one of them. Since we have no information on the inner workings of the CIC system, gathering information about these identifiers is totally pointless.