+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Hi everyone CC charged today. I am really thankful for the people who keep on updating their application status here. I need help though in updating spreadsheet.

Visa office: Manila
NOC Code: 0112
Application reached CIO: November 25
Payment Method: CC
Charged date: January 21 around 10 am Canada time

Just a few mishaps in my application if it will be helpful
- I did not indicate my UCI number (obtained from my recent tourist visa).
- In schedule 3 economic class. I ticked the box beside No (since I did not study in Canada) but I also ticked the box beside You accidentaly. This made me nervous because I thought they would return my application due to incompleteness since I did not provide supporting docs related to Study in Canada

Waiting for PER begins... All the best to everyone in this forum and keep the hopes up! :)
 
Good morning All!

Are there any watsapp link up currently available for NOC 0113?
 
frommchicago said:
Alhamdulillah... Credit card charged today.
Nov 25 th applicant
Noc 3111

Congrate chicago
 
tasR said:
i see some of you saying CC has been charged. What do you mean by it?

It means Credit Card has been charged.
 
What are da chances of 20 nov cc applicant being charged when later applicants have been charged?
 
Dasa12345 said:
What are da chances of 20 nov cc applicant being charged when later applicants have been charged?
Don't worry there are still Oct applicants that are waiting to be charged!
 
If the eligibility is negative, does the money gets refunded ?

jdan.shah said:
I see few questions in last posts, let me see if i can answer:

CC - credit card
CC charged means - Credit card is charged for their application. It means your application is reviewed and found positive. Next step is to get an email from CIC with positive or negative eligibility, which is usually people on this forum refer as PER.
Most probably (90+%) people get positive elibiblity email. means after this your file is shifted to respective visa office (VO).

right now most of the October people are getting PER so november people though they are charged have to wait for few weeks.

All this info am sharing from my experience on the forum.
All the best to all!!!
 
BjFire said:
If the eligibility is negative, does the money gets refunded ?

To my understanding yes, others claim otherwise.
So I am unsure, but I hope that I will never know from first hand experience.
 
after DD enchased how much chances do we have for PER?
 
Okay thanks. Can there be a request for document also before PER or the doc request is something that happens only after processing starts ?

ghostrideryu said:
To my understanding yes, others claim otherwise.
So I am unsure, but I hope that I will never know from first hand experience.
 
jetfighter77 said:
after DD enchased how much chances do we have for PER?
Not more or less at all.
It does not relate to it at all.
Our application has been checked for completeness and this time it will be checked against specific requirements.
 
mY APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED ON 28 NOV UNDER 2281. It was DD.I don't know if I can Make it into the cap?Please help if you have any info.


thanks
 
Saw this under another subject heading...


Re: FSW 2014 Applicants Timeline- Lets Network Here.
« Reply #185850 on: January 21, 2015, 03:44:12 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote
Canadian Immigration Processing Still Has “High Error Rate”

Guys / Gals - this is a very interesting article by David Cohen - Immigration Lawyer; thought I should share with you all.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has taken recent steps to improve and expedite immigration applications. The new Express Entry immigration selection system, which was introduced two weeks ago, aims to process submitted applications within six months, and several new Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) streams have also come into operation. Additionally, applications are increasingly being processed online, with the aim of reducing errors and processing times.
While the future of Canadian immigration appears promising, there are several imperfections that have recently come to light. Internal government documents have revealed a high level of human error by CIC staff in Canadian immigration processing on applications for permanent residence, temporary work permits, and refugee status.
“Quality management” reviews, which were obtained by the Toronto Star newspaper earlier this month, provide a glimpse into the extent of these official errors. The documents reveal that, among other issues, staff have failed to use correct form letters, address missing documents, and provide accurate timelines. This could create unnecessary backlogs and delays, or even cost individual applicants a chance to live and work in Canada.
Some resourceful applicants have been able to correct errors, reapply, and correct problems before those problems cost them their chance of immigrating to Canada. Others were not as fortunate. Applicants have cited inconsistencies and a perceived lack of procedural fairness and clarity in the application processing by government of Canada officials.
In other instances, applicants who had submitted applications to CIC may not have been fully aware that errors had been made on their applications, leading to frustration and disappointment.
According to a review of 996 files handled at the Vegreville Case Processing Centre in Alberta, which deals with permanent residence applications, between November 1 and December 6, 2014, the quality management team found that of the 617 request letters sent to applicants:
13 per cent did not address all missing items;
23 per cent had either no timeline, an incomplete timeline, or did not mention the consequences of failing to reply to the request; and
six per cent were either “not professional” or chose the incorrect template form.
Of 426 files that received a second review, decisions were still pending on 149 owing to errors made at an earlier stage.
Some individuals, including spokespersons from the Canada Employment and Immigration Union which represents a large number of CIC staff, have attributed the high error rate to part-time staff, who may not have the necessary training and experience needed in order to perform their duties to the highest possible standard.
The reaction
“It is unfortunate to hear about immigration cases that, with some expert guidance, should have been relatively straightforward, but were delayed or rejected due to human error. People's hopes and dreams are at stake here,” says Attorney David Cohen.
“In spite of this news, I would encourage potential immigrants to Canada to maintain a positive outlook about Canada — both the country itself and its immigration process. Canada continues to have one of the highest per capita rates of immigration in the world, a fact that is highly unlikely to change over the coming years.
“Very often, the problems faced by applicants when dealing with immigration officials can be dealt with, provided that the applicant has access to good information about his or her case and rights. For an applicant, retaining the services of an experienced immigration lawyer to represent him or her in an application for Canadian immigration could make the difference between huge disappointment on the one hand, and a new life in Canada on the other.
 
stelimeli said:
Don't worry there are still Oct applicants that are waiting to be charged!
[/quote-]
And any of them got charged when november applicants charging started?
 
Dasa12345 said:
stelimeli said:
Don't worry there are still Oct applicants that are waiting to be charged!
And any of them got charged when november applicants charging started?
And what are the possible reasons for cc charge delay?