+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Status
Not open for further replies.
mustaeem said:
Brothers,

I am a 14th May 2133 SGVO Applicant. Received my AOR on 26th September 2014. And still there is no second line updates and also no medical request.

Am wondering how CIC is processing files and am getting a bit anxious now by seeing people getting updates for later date applications.

Any comments or thoughts. :(

It was observed that SGVO sends MR after security check, which means that you have to wait for several months. Good news is that you will receive it along with RPRF and PPR.
 
ahsan99 said:
i think if applicant resides in USA or some such country then he may receiv application even within 2 weeks

That's true, I received mine 2 weeks after date on the letter
 
opindersinghbuttar said:
AHSAN ...

i think it must be a false entry as the completeness check for Oct would have been done in the last 2-3 weeks only ..... and it takes at least 30 days Via CIC snail mail, mebbe more before the application reaches its owner after being returned by CIC.

secondly if the CAP was reached, CIC would have updated it like 3012 ( registered nurses) but only 3012 has been updated ... no others.

thirdly as per trends .... early Nov application would be covered within the CAP

however I could be totally wrong lol ....

secondly why anyone will upload FALSE entry? what benefit they will get from it?
 
jayampw said:
Congrats!! All the best!!
You would have sent the PCC with the application, right? and NDVO would have considered that.


Now I see some ray of hope for mine too :D :D
hi am 6th june applicant...no MR yet...what to do ....my VO is NDVO
 
PER will not be updated in ECas.. you will receive the mail for PER

Sebrina said:
Will PER be updated in ecas? Or it shows nly in process
 
ahsan99 said:
thnx for ur comments.

sandeep did u see above comment by opindersinghbuttar.which is:


i just saw one post claiming that there is an entry in the SS where a 9th OCT NOC 2132 application has been returned due to CAP being reached...

could this be true Huh? as it only shows 624 after today's/yesterday's update

anyone who is familiar with the SS please check and confirm....

many thanks.

forget it..this cant be true.....those entries are jus meant to confuse nd panic us.....its unfortunate tht we dont have a ----- finger smiley for those loosers.....
 
Grace1978 said:
Now I worry more,

there is no change in NOC 5125 from last update it was 71 and it is 71 :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

I'm Sep 29-th aplicant am I out of game?

Grace, 1113 still says 'zero' complete applications, while I know a guy who applied under this occupation and got PER months ago.
 
ahsan99 said:
i think if applicant resides in USA or some such country then he may receiv application even within 2 weeks

true ... i believe 2 weeks .. but that means the cap was reached atleast 2 weeks ago ... and there have been 2 updates after that ...... so i say a false entry.
 
CanOl said:
I need to be on the forum more often, it seems !! ;) ;) ;) ;D ;D ;D :P :P
[size=10pt]YOU DEFINITELY SHOULD[/size]
 
Till now.. no news regarding file... plz help.. wht will happen??
 
opindersinghbuttar said:
true ... i believe 2 weeks .. but that means the cap was reached atleast 2 weeks ago ... and there have been 2 updates after that ...... so i say a false entry.
 
Diplomatru said:
Grace, 1113 still says 'zero' complete applications, while I know a guy who applied under this occupation and got PER months ago.

Diplomatru that is VERY Interesting ::) Thanks for hope & your input ;) I will keep on my hope :)
 
adamsands25 said:
Dear all
My CC charged just now. NOC 0015. Date of submission 24 September
Thanks

Congratulations! Waiting for my own too. It is well!
 
ahsan99 said:

what was receiving date of ur application?

when it was returned?

what was reason of rejection?

That's OLD story

what was receiving date of ur application? - June 4-th

when it was returned? - September 19-th

what was reason of rejection? Missing Original WES
 
Status
Not open for further replies.