ILoveAB
Hero Member
- Jan 21, 2014
- 350
- 17
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- London
- NOC Code......
- 2113
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 16-01-2014
- Med's Request
- 13-06-2014
- Interview........
- Waived
much_mann said:@ bagga71
The letter from NDVO should specifiy the specific concerns they have or suspect (see extract from OP 6C page 26 quoted below). Your reply in writing should address those specific concerns, get documentary evidence to back up the clarity and genuiness of your employment. If needed or if you can convince your manager/supervisor that was interviewed to write a letter addressing the specific of where they claim they suspect the misrepresenation will be even better and written on the company letter head with possibly a contact information of the next officer above your manager/supervisor to corroborate the detail.
This is your shot to clear and convince you did not misrepesent your case as a failure to convince will mean your GCMS notes may carry the comments on possible misrepresentation and may tag you for inadmissbility into canada for 2yrs.
Good luck
extract from OP 6C page 26
In accordance with principles of procedural fairness, concerns that a visa officer may have regarding the accuracy or authenticity of information or documentation should be communicated to the applicant, whether these concerns are raised as the result of site visits, telephone checks, or through other means. Concerns can be communicated to the applicant in writing or at an interview.
Officers may choose to conduct interviews with applicants to:
ensure that information or documentation submitted as part of the application is truthful and complete;
detect and deter fraudulent information and documents;
clarify specific information or details; and
conduct quality control.
Very good info. +1 for you my friend