FSW 2013 Applicants Timeline- Lets Network Here.

[kewlCanada]

@ seniors,

I dont think that there is any such instruction to make spouse as applicant( in the the guide for filling family information )
In both the forms I kept myself as applicant and at the top of the form for my wife I wrote spouse's family info just to distinguish it from my family info , hope this will not considered as mistake as I submitted forms for both of us ...

Seniors any suggestions on this issue ???

Quote from: rssb on July 11, 2013, 02:06:18 pm
Thank you very much for the reply. Does my wife need to fill out IMM5406 form? If yes, does she need to add her name as "Applicant" and my name under "spouse"?

Thanks again.

sHE HAS TO FILL THE FORM AS WELL FOR HER FAMILY INFO AND WRITE HER NAME IN APPLICANT AND YOUR NAME IN SPOUSE.SHE HAS TO GIVE DETAILS OF HER MOTHER,FATHER , BROS AND SIS.

 

[jigzyy]

@ seniors,

I dont think that there is any such instruction to make spouse as applicant( in the the guide for filling family information )
In both the forms I kept myself as applicant and at the top of the form for my wife I wrote spouse's family info just to distinguish it from my family info , hope this will not considered as mistake as I submitted forms for both of us ...

Seniors any suggestions on this issue ???

Quote from: rssb on July 11, 2013, 02:06:18 pm
Thank you very much for the reply. Does my wife need to fill out IMM5406 form? If yes, does she need to add her name as "Applicant" and my name under "spouse"?

Thanks again.

See, they have asked for "Applicants" and not "Principal Applicant" which is you. According to the instructions or how the form is designed it has to be like this:

Yours:
ABC - Applicant
XYZ - Spouse

Wife:
XYZ - Applicant
ABC - Spouse

Both of you are Applicants AND you are Principal applicant. There is a difference between both. As far mistake is concerned, I guess not fatal but might delay a bit.

 

[kewlCanada]

yeah thats why on my wife's form I wrote spouse's form
actually form is not proper , just like in Background declaration form they have clearly
asked to tick "principal applicant " or "spouse " , I think I am fine with that

But thanks for reply and clarification Jigzyy

See, they have asked for "Applicants" and not "Principal Applicant" which is you. According to the instructions or how the form is designed it has to be like this:

Yours:
ABC - Applicant
XYZ - Spouse

Wife:
XYZ - Applicant
ABC - Spouse

Both of you are Applicants AND you are Principal applicant. There is a difference between both. As far mistake is concerned, I guess not fatal but might delay a bit.

 

[Javachip]

With this Applicant and spouse thing, You know Jigzy you're right. I just came to think of it when the question arise and reviewed the application I submitted. Unfortunately, I committed the same mistake and there's nothing I can do now. You have the same opinion with my husband when he's filling out his form but my opinion overrule. Tsk tsk tsk. :'(. Hope CIO officer will consider this small mistake.

 

[kewlCanada]

javachip , this is a mistake we should not worry because there is no clarity from CIC side ( as per their guide) and infact they have done a little bit mistake in designing this form also

With this Applicant and spouse thing, You know Jigzy you're right. I just came to think of it when the question arise and reviewed the application I submitted. Unfortunately, I committed the same mistake and there's nothing I can do now. You have the same opinion with my husband when he's filling out his form but my opinion overrule. Tsk tsk tsk. :'(. Hope CIO officer will consider this small mistake.

 

[jigzyy]

javachip , this is a mistake we should not worry because there is no clarity from CIC side ( as per their guide) and infact they have done a little bit mistake in designing this form also

The form is designed to go with any application package, like study, visit, worker etc, that's why they haven't mentioned it like Principal Applicant & Accompanying dependents like they did on the Background Declaration.

 

[jigzyy]

With this Applicant and spouse thing, You know Jigzy you're right. I just came to think of it when the question arise and reviewed the application I submitted. Unfortunately, I committed the same mistake and there's nothing I can do now. You have the same opinion with my husband when he's filling out his form but my opinion overrule. Tsk tsk tsk. :'(. Hope CIO officer will consider this small mistake.

It's a common mistake. I guess not sending at all is more fatal than sending but with this minor mistake. IF the rest of the form except this applicant & spouse thing is correct [like parents & siblings], I guess it'll pass through.

 

[jigzyy]

Dear all,

Got the PER email four hours ago (Dated July 11, CC charged on 8th July) , but I have just noticed it.
I wish all the best for all of the forum members here.

Updated. Congrats.

 

[Javachip]

Thanks kewlcanada for the support and Jigzyy for the explanation. . I should have known this forum right from the start I'm preparing my application. Well thanks to the people who started and contributed on this forum. ;D

 

[jigzyy]

name R MANO
paper sent :18-5
paper received 23-5
fee method :cc
received at 3.30 pm
received by dexter
NOC :3216

Application sent:6 MAy
Application received:11 May
NOC=2147
CC encashed:8 July
PER recieved:11 July.


Thnx

There are a lot of information that is missing for both you, like Visa Office, IELTS, education etc etc. Please review spreadsheet and provide missing details. Thanks!

 

[jigzyy]

There was someone who posted details for 2174 & CC charged as well just few posts before, and now can't find him / her. Please post back. RMZ or something like this was username

 

[jigzyy]

Smrithy Please find your entry in the spreadsheet, and provide the rest of the details for the tracker . Thanks!

 

[DR-DARKMAN]

Smrithy Please find your entry in the spreadsheet, and provide the rest of the details for the tracker . Thanks!

hi jigzyy good work and effort as usual ...

when do u think they will start sending files to VO ?

what will VO assess or do exactly .. or just routine work .. will they try to contact the university for credential or employer for work check or any other checks .. or usually some routine work without further checks .. plz advice ?

so do u think that PER open the rest of the way?

thx in advance

 

[janeyandstuart]

Received PER email from CIO 11 July-24 hours after CC charged.
Woo hoo!

 

[reddevil7281]

Received PER email from CIO 11 July-24 hours after CC charged.
Woo hoo!

Congrats! Great news