prince_of_darkness said:
Hassan,
In my opinion , again to retract its my opinion and urs might differ,
Application for Permanent Residence - Federal skilled Worker submitted to Sydney, Nova Scotia
this is the one which applies to us.
The other two is applicable for PNP's or dependents or spouse.
Once again
the explanation for "In Process" leads us to believe that file is already at VO and eligibility by VO is also done? No it is not in Process . Its gathering dust, Let the Site say anything it has to. No one is looking at your file.
Many manuals are written all across the globe, none are followed.
These are written to make a safer side for CIC so that once it gets to court then they have something to rely on.
None of the steps can be guessed by applicants.
Well we can have an argument all along in this matter and once again these r my opinions and I am not a lawyer, cic representative or any one written in ur long list.
Even CIC representatives in my view r no good mate.
If lawyers were so good then manish's representative wouldnt have asked him to submit his application even with 4K, though the official is 11K.
Every Tom, Dick and Harry here in UK is an Immigration Consultant. In every Nook and Corner u will find one who have completed some basic course and declaring themselves Immigration Consultant. But in reality they know nothing. So ur long list in MY view is nothing. All they care for is ur money in their pocket.
Ultimate is whether u follow the manual or not , its the PR which we more concerned for. Not the manual.
But i guess your believe in the manuals and process are far more stronger than mine.
So no offence these are my opinions your might differ.
These r my views.
Thanks for your reply.
01. I NEVER talked about CIC Representatives!! I think in a rush to reply to me, you did not read my post carefully and totally failed to get the true gist of what I am trying to say. I was talking about CIC official website, Forms, checklists, manuals etc. If someone reads the form carefully as well as the checklist, he/she will notice on Pg.1 of IMM5612, that an officer will usually base their decision on the documents on file. And one of the documents on file, in the case of Manish, and for all of us, is proof of funds. So, if officer sees that proof of funds is less than what is required, does he not have reason to reject?
02. Getting a lawyer or consultant, does not mean that you act as a DUMMY and just give all your documents and d decision making powers to them and don't participate at all in the application process. It is YOUR application and not the lawyer's or consultant's. If Manish had careully read the document checklist and the CIC website for proof of funds, he would have in fact told his lawyer or consultant, and then for sure, they would have asked him to send the whole 11K statement.
03. If you believe ICCRC registered consultants (after passing basic course, in your opinion) know NOTHING, then extremely sorry to say, we could also assume that ALL OF US HERE HAVE PASSED AN EDUCATIONAL DEGREE and might not know NOTHING and thus might NOT BE EVEN ELIGIBLE TO IMMIGRATE TO CANADA!!!!!
Anyways, your post and views also mean nothing to me.
So no offence these are my opinions your might differ!!!!!!!!
P.S. One thing I TOTALLY agree with you: WE ARE ALL INTERESTED IN PR AND NOT THE MANUALS!!!!