can88da said:
1. Can you tell me what would be the outcome of the Jan 14-16 hearing? I mean will the judge give the verdict at that time or will the case proceed forward?
It depends upon how the lawyers are going to argue during 14-16 January 2013. If the judge is convinced by the lawyers that the law is unconstitutional, then one can expect the judge to rule that the law is unlawful (meaning, a victory to all of the pre-Feb 2008 FSW applicants).
I don't think the verdict will come out on 16 January 2013. I guess it might be towards the end of this month or may be in the first half of next month (February 2013).
If the judge rules that the law is unlawful and if the judge does not allow for an appeal against his ruling, then that is the end of the case. No more proceeding forward.
can88da said:
2. Can some one, like myself, be part of the litigation proceed started by David Cohen and other lawyers now or has the time for that passed?
As of now, I think, all the lawyers have already closed their groups. But who knows, if you are lucky enough, you might get a chance in the future to join any of the lawyer's groups. In the meantime, get in touch with any of the lawyer of your choice and express your interest in joining their group. No harm trying. Enough wasting time. Act now. No more second thoughts, start immediately.
can88da said:
3. Can the judge bypass the new immigration act passed by parliament and rule in favor of the affectees?
It is not about 'bypass'. We litigants want the judge to rule that the law is unconstitutional. We want the judge to hit straight and rule that the law is unlawful. If the judge does so, then it is a favourable judgement to all of the applicants, whether they are litigants or not.
can88da said:
4. Can the CIC accept immigration of the affectees in any out of court settlement and go against the immigration act rule which states that March 29 2012 was the last date to have any sort of action on an immigration case?
If Jason Kenney wishes so, then it is very much possible. But, I don't think that is probable. Not even 1% chance, according to me.
Jason Kenney is a brave warrior! He will never compromise or accept success/defeat through the backdoor or behind the screen! We all want him to fight it out in the court and thereby want him to accept his defeat in the very court itself. Only that will be a honourable victory for we litigants, after having come through this long with our litigation.