Hi All,
Correct me if I'm wrong. Based on my understanding, it is said that for proof of english proficiency is either ielts or written explanation. That, written explanation is applicable if first official language is english or french. Therefore, although I'm not an native english speaker but have this as my second languange in my country I can still prove my profieciency through diplomas, trainings, right? plus ofcourse the written explanation that I will be doing. Having said that I'm working now in Australia which english is the official language and lived here for 3 years. Plus studied in school wherein english is medium of teaching.
My question would be, was that worth notto do ielts and just do the written explanation?
Correct me if I'm wrong. Based on my understanding, it is said that for proof of english proficiency is either ielts or written explanation. That, written explanation is applicable if first official language is english or french. Therefore, although I'm not an native english speaker but have this as my second languange in my country I can still prove my profieciency through diplomas, trainings, right? plus ofcourse the written explanation that I will be doing. Having said that I'm working now in Australia which english is the official language and lived here for 3 years. Plus studied in school wherein english is medium of teaching.
My question would be, was that worth notto do ielts and just do the written explanation?