- Mar 3, 2016
- 3
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Hong Kong
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- January 2015
- Interview........
- March 2016 Refused. Submit Appeal ........: March 2016 . Bluebook Recieved ........: June 2016. Waiting for Appearance Date......: November 2016. WTF?
Discriminatory and Prejudiced Bureaucratic Arrogance. Hong Kong 03/2016
[Agent] Your wife called me two hours ago. She was on her way to home from Hong Kong after her interview.
She told me that the interviewer asked her questions about her son and your children. The interviewer asked her why you spent time with your children instead of your wife. Your wife answered that you both didn't think the process would take so long thus you spent your vacation with your children in Canada.
And the interviewer also said that you both couldn't communicate each other since both of you didn't know each other's language.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Husband] I wonder where CIC found the information about my holiday visits to my kids.
My holidays were only briefly mentioned in chats, but it is also possible those chat records were not even included in our application.
It just means that they must have scrutinized the chat records.
I thought perhaps they had not even looked at our chat history before dismissing the application.
Do you think the application was given thorough examination?
Regardless, my children are an important relationship. My visits to my children should not affect my wife's immigration status. This is total unrelated nonsense.
Yes, it probably could become a human rights issue in my country, if some bureaucrat tried to use this kind of logic in Canadian law.
[ husband] I also talked to my wife when she arrived home last night.
She described some of what occurred during the interview.
Without question, the Immigration officer discounted our marriage relationship which has been active and vital almost 4 years. I am very disappointed to be treated with such disregard.
This bureaucratic arrogance is discriminatory and prejudiced. Stereotypical discrimination is not tolerated in any civil office in my country, Canada.
No doubt, unproven presumptions made by your Hong Kong immigration worker could bring civil rights prosecution if presented as such in Canada,. The officer took a brief look at our complete binder, made two or three lame remarks about the validity of our relationship, then rejected our application.
[Agent] Your wife called me two hours ago. She was on her way to home from Hong Kong after her interview.
She told me that the interviewer asked her questions about her son and your children. The interviewer asked her why you spent time with your children instead of your wife. Your wife answered that you both didn't think the process would take so long thus you spent your vacation with your children in Canada.
And the interviewer also said that you both couldn't communicate each other since both of you didn't know each other's language.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Husband] I wonder where CIC found the information about my holiday visits to my kids.
My holidays were only briefly mentioned in chats, but it is also possible those chat records were not even included in our application.
It just means that they must have scrutinized the chat records.
I thought perhaps they had not even looked at our chat history before dismissing the application.
Do you think the application was given thorough examination?
Regardless, my children are an important relationship. My visits to my children should not affect my wife's immigration status. This is total unrelated nonsense.
Yes, it probably could become a human rights issue in my country, if some bureaucrat tried to use this kind of logic in Canadian law.
[ husband] I also talked to my wife when she arrived home last night.
She described some of what occurred during the interview.
Without question, the Immigration officer discounted our marriage relationship which has been active and vital almost 4 years. I am very disappointed to be treated with such disregard.
This bureaucratic arrogance is discriminatory and prejudiced. Stereotypical discrimination is not tolerated in any civil office in my country, Canada.
No doubt, unproven presumptions made by your Hong Kong immigration worker could bring civil rights prosecution if presented as such in Canada,. The officer took a brief look at our complete binder, made two or three lame remarks about the validity of our relationship, then rejected our application.
