My RPRF letter mentioned admissibility under review. Does that mean I already passed the eligibility stage? Status is still "application in progress" under Background Check.from what have I recently gathered, your eligibility should be recommended as 'Pass' in GCMS if they have mentioned admissibility in your RPRF letter.
It's confusing really. Need @legalfalcon to guide us here.My RPRF letter mentioned admissibility under review. Does that mean I already passed the eligibility stage? Status is still "application in progress" under Background Check.
Is there any update on your status after you have paid the RFRP? Are you still at IP1 or IP2?My RPRF letter mentioned admissibility under review. Does that mean I already passed the eligibility stage? Status is still "application in progress" under Background Check.
Hi otmans!Is there any update on your status after you have paid the RFRP? Are you still at IP1 or IP2?
Thanks for your reply, good luck! I guess it doesn't really make much of a difference when you receive the RPRF request shortly after AOR or late into the process.Hi otmans!
Still IP1.
I really thought that it's just going to take a week after the RPRF is paid. But I was wrong. It'll be two months tomorrow after RPRF.Thanks for your reply, good luck! I guess it doesn't really make much of a difference when you receive the RPRF request shortly after AOR or late into the process.
that was in 2017. In 2018, i have read posts mentioning PPR about 90-100 days after RPRF.I really thought that it's just going to take a week after the RPRF is paid. But I was wrong. It'll be two months tomorrow after RPRF.
Hey, my RPRF request also mentioned admissibility being reviewed and not eligibility. Were you able to figure out what that meant, if eligibility is passed or what stage the application was in?that was in 2017. In 2018, i have read posts mentioning PPR about 90-100 days after RPRF.
from what I have read in my GCMS notes, both CIO and CPC Ottawa have recommended Passed as far as eligibility is concerned, and CIO has recommended criminality passed as well. Therefore, a matter of time before it is approved unless of course they find adverse information from some source (even I would love to know what it is that I am guilty of except wanting to do better in life )Hey, my RPRF request also mentioned admissibility being reviewed and not eligibility. Were you able to figure out what that meant, if eligibility is passed or what stage the application was in?
Thanks,
Tony
from what I have read in my GCMS notes, both CIO and CPC Ottawa have recommended Passed as far as eligibility is concerned, and CIO has recommended criminality passed as well. Therefore, a matter of time before it is approved unless of course they find adverse information from some source (even I would love to know what it is that I am guilty of except wanting to do better in life )
The admissibility bit I am not sure what it means frankly.
well, I am guessing it will be sometime in second half of July, around the 100-day mark.Wow that's great. Good luck, I am sure there is good news just around the corner.
Zag, this answers our question.assuming ottawa of course cuz there's no mention of any location or any email id.
if you check my GCMS post in April AoR thread, they requested for RPRF after two rounds of review - the first round on April 19 was conducted by a Program Asst. at CIO, where the recommendation was 'Pass' (both eligibility and criminality), and then another round by the case analyst at CPC, Ottawa on May 14, following which the request for RPRF was generated by the same case analyst at that point; the case analyst also recommended 'Pass'(nothing on criminality here).Zag, this answers our question.
https://grayninjaguidetocanada.blog/2016/09/27/rprf-request-letter/
As per the sample RPRF there, admissibility review is security, criminality and/or medical. So as BillHyatt (or it may have been legalfalcon) said, eligibility would come first before admissibility. So if you are in the admissibility stage, then it is assumed that you already passed eligibility because there is no point conducting admissibility if you failed the eligibility stage. BillHyatt (or legalfalcon) also said that eligibility and admissibility cannot be done simultaneously since it is a waste of time conducting both if you can just do the one which will determine if you need to do to the other.