I am posting here mostly to make a reminder:
When in doubt, follow the instructions; otherwise, yep, follow the instructions.
The query posed here suggests someone is considering otherwise. My sense is that a forum like this should not hesitate to remind prospective applicants how important it is to follow the instructions.
tyl92 said:
hello guys i have a friend who is applying for canadian citizenship , does he have to declare all the citizenships he has on the form ?
of course i think he has to declare obviously ,the one he applied with , for his pr status ?
thanks a lot
tyl92 said:
He told me he thought he just had to declare the one he applied with on his pr application.
He currently has 2 .on his pr application he just specified one
I concur in previous responses, that
ALL countries in which the applicant has citizenship must be disclosed in the application for Canadian citizenship, and
ALL countries in which the applicant has permanent resident status,
or the equivalent, must likewise be disclosed.
There is no doubt about this whatsoever.
What confuses and concerns me is the query itself. Not every element of the citizenship application is easily understood,
but relative to this, the application form is very straight-forward and not susceptible to any other interpretation. There should be no doubt, no question: applicants are required to disclose all countries in which they have citizenship, and all countries in which they have the equivalent of status to permanently reside.
Item 6.C. in the current application form, consistent with every version of the application form there has been for many years now, asks:
"Are you a citizen of any other country(ies)?"
Only a stateless person can check the "no" box without making a material misrepresentation. All who check "yes" (everyone who is not stateless) is then instructed:
"If yes, list the country(ies)."
Again, there is no way this can be interpreted other than requiring the applicant to disclose
ALL countries for which the applicant is a citizen. A failure to do so would be an overt misrepresentation. That, in-itself, could be grounds to deny the application. That, in-itself could be grounds for revoking citizenship
forever.
Item 6.F. is similar, regarding permanent resident status, or its equivalence, in any other country, and the box for this item actually has multiple lines to enter such disclosures for multiple countries (there are multiple lines for this item because the instruction requires the applicant to also declare the date of acquiring such status, whereas regarding citizenship in other countries, all the applicant has to do is list all countries in which the applicant has citizenship).
Thus . . .
Where does the question come from? Why is this question being asked?
I am not challenging the OP,
tyl92, here . . . . even though, obviously,
tyl92 could have just glanced at the application form and answered the question without posing it here. A forum like this should encourage everyone to post any questions they have, even if the answer should be obvious.
I do not doubt there is a "friend" who raised this question.
But I will say that the question itself has implications. No need to speculate beyond acknowledging the question itself appears to be about whether or not someone can get away with not fully answering the questions in the citizenship application. I do not know why. Does not matter why. It would be utterly foolish to go down that road . . . even though, sure, in many ways others have successfully gone down that road. Anyone following much at all about such things should readily recognize that more get away with this, or that, than than the number who get caught. Still a bad bet. Still not the way to go. And, the odds of success are diminishing every year.
Thus, as I often say:
when in doubt, follow the instructions; otherwise, yep, follow the instructions. And best to not even think of what the chances are of getting away with not following the instructions.