decision made before medicals

[daymiel]

We received your application for permanent residence on March 3, 2010.

We reviewed your application and sent you a letter on April 16, 2010. Please consider delays in mail delivery before contacting us.

Your application and supporting documents were received by the Manila office. They are pending review.

We transferred your application to the Manila office on April 20, 2010. The Manila office may contact you.

Your application was reviewed and we started processing on September 9, 2010.

A decision has been made on your application. The office will contact you concerning this decision.

Another case of decision made before medicals.....this might be a rejection. I haven't recieved anything from my email. Normally, everytime my ecas gets updated I also recieve a letter from them. Anyone got any ideas?

 

[imran007]

The decision made comment get added later on or was there when it changes to inprocess?

 

[explorer101]

Decision made before medicals is bad news, wait for official confirmation and see the grounds of rejection.

 

[daymiel]

in my case i didnt see it in process. i just saw it changed to decision made as of this morning although it states there that they started processing it on Sept. 9, 2010. anyone had the same experience? there is no letter from them that is why im confused.

 

[rocky272727]

in my case i didnt see it in process. i just saw it changed to decision made as of this morning although it states there that they started processing it on Sept. 9, 2010. anyone had the same experience? there is no letter from them that is why im confused.

Yes, as they might have checked your file and as per the documentation or assessment, you might not be eligible for immigration under the category you applied.

Wait for official communication from CIC

 

[pooja82]

hi daymiel
pray to ur lord n hope for the best
u never know
keep ur fingers crossed
cheers
pooja

 

[daymiel]

thanks guys. I know that everything happens for a reason so I dont feel bad about this. Its just I wanna know what exactly went wrong so I can get over with it. Ill keep you guys posted.

 

[pooja82]

all d best

 

[asyousuf]

thanks guys. I know that everything happens for a reason so I dont feel bad about this. Its just I wanna know what exactly went wrong so I can get over with it. Ill keep you guys posted.

Gud luk to you bro.

Better contact CHC via email and inquire about the status. Technical errors are also highly probable and have been experienced in few many cases.

Truely said that this is not an end of world.
Best of luk
Ashraf

 

[ankit_20]

@daymiel

ounds like not good news. Wait for official communication or just send and e-mail and ask CHC if they need any additional information on your file

 

[advisors]

We received your application for permanent residence on March 3, 2010.

We reviewed your application and sent you a letter on April 16, 2010. Please consider delays in mail delivery before contacting us.

Your application and supporting documents were received by the Manila office. They are pending review.

We transferred your application to the Manila office on April 20, 2010. The Manila office may contact you.

Your application was reviewed and we started processing on September 9, 2010.

A decision has been made on your application. The office will contact you concerning this decision.

Another case of decision made before medicals.....this might be a rejection. I haven't recieved anything from my email. Normally, everytime my ecas gets updated I also recieve a letter from them. Anyone got any ideas?
[/quoDe




Dear daymiel
Tha same happened to me last year and the decision was rejection, but it does not mean the end. you can contact the visa office if there is mistake in the assessment of your applicaltion and they usually reply within few days and re open the file if there is a valid reason.


Advisor s

 

[phdmaker]

We received your application for permanent residence on March 3, 2010.

We reviewed your application and sent you a letter on April 16, 2010. Please consider delays in mail delivery before contacting us.

Your application and supporting documents were received by the Manila office. They are pending review.

We transferred your application to the Manila office on April 20, 2010. The Manila office may contact you.

Your application was reviewed and we started processing on September 9, 2010.

A decision has been made on your application. The office will contact you concerning this decision.

Another case of decision made before medicals.....this might be a rejection. I haven't recieved anything from my email. Normally, everytime my ecas gets updated I also recieve a letter from them. Anyone got any ideas?

Sad to hear that.

Would u plz let us know what could be the possible reason behind it? Are u short of 67 points or something else?

Thanks in advance.

 

[daymiel]

i dont have a clue of what went wrong. should i send them an email? do you think its too early for that? im worried because it says they processed my application and they made a decision within 5 days. and i dont know if i will get a refund. btw, what is Manila's email address for enquiry?

 

[sau2calgary]

We received your application for permanent residence on March 3, 2010.

We reviewed your application and sent you a letter on April 16, 2010. Please consider delays in mail delivery before contacting us.

Your application and supporting documents were received by the Manila office. They are pending review.

We transferred your application to the Manila office on April 20, 2010. The Manila office may contact you.

Your application was reviewed and we started processing on September 9, 2010.

A decision has been made on your application. The office will contact you concerning this decision.

Another case of decision made before medicals.....this might be a rejection. I haven't recieved anything from my email. Normally, everytime my ecas gets updated I also recieve a letter from them. Anyone got any ideas?

several reasons why decision made before medicals:
- documents being submitted and verified by VO are not authentic, insuficient funds, lack of required points.