Hi Folks,
I am just curious is there a double standard when it comes to "Decision Made" status for old applicants versus new ones? The reason I ask is that it has been reported on numerous occasions that it takes much more time for those type of applicants (those that received RQs) to receive their oath letter than the applications that are straight forward.
Citizenship applications in St Clair would first have to be moved to the local office and then schedule oath so that could result in additional days of delay. Your thoughts and comments are welcome.
I am just curious is there a double standard when it comes to "Decision Made" status for old applicants versus new ones? The reason I ask is that it has been reported on numerous occasions that it takes much more time for those type of applicants (those that received RQs) to receive their oath letter than the applications that are straight forward.
Citizenship applications in St Clair would first have to be moved to the local office and then schedule oath so that could result in additional days of delay. Your thoughts and comments are welcome.