It was a declaration from my Non accompanying to give authorisation to take our daughter along to canadaCan you please tell me what Adr was requested from you ??
It was a declaration from my Non accompanying to give authorisation to take our daughter along to canadaCan you please tell me what Adr was requested from you ??
All the bestGHOST UPDATE GUYS..... atleast something.... DEC AOR 1
CongratulationsGuys it's PPR
MEP: 16.01.19 | AOR: 07.12.18 | VO: Ottawa |
Stream: FSW-Outland | Citizen/Residence: India |PPR 21.06.19
I received 1 ghost update on 15th june for IP2 then received ADR on 20th june.. n received 2nd ghost ystrday arnd 11.30pm then received PPR last night arnd 3.49amHey how many ghost updates you received?? And did you moved to IP2??
I also received ghost update but my file is in IP1 still...
Ohhhh... I just received this one only today and nothing changed inside my application..all the entities are same as before and application is still in IP1.. however, as per my call to cic about three weeks ago, only security was pending. So, I guess this update might be related to the completion of security, I am not sure though.I received 1 ghost update on 15th june for IP2 then received ADR on 20th june.. n received 2nd ghost ystrday arnd 11.30pm then received PPR last night arnd 3.49am
Please remember that issuance of Procedural Fairness Letter means that the Case Officer has not decided anything on the matter your response and actions / history leading upto the response will shape the Case Officers opinion.Hello Everyone,
I need one help. I have received yesterday Procedural Fairness Letter from CIC pertaining to POF
As part of POF document i had submitted a letter stating the actual funds (about INR 16,75,000 from HDFC Bank) of my Savings Account Plus 6 Months Bank statement
The case officer is concerned about a set of transactions - Which were credited to my account (listed below)
and have asked for explanation on the Source of funds via these transactions.
100,000 INR on December 1st 2018
75,000 INR on December 11th 2018
67,000 INR on December 11th 2018
4,50,000 INR on December 12th 2018
2,00,000 INR on December 12th 2018
1,50,450 INR on December 13th 2018
I have explanation of all of these transaction (These funds are from my own accounts from different banks and primary reason was to consolidate all money in single account. I have obtained necessary proofs)
However i don't know how to explain the below one: (It is significant amount)
4,50,000 INR on December 12th 2018
This is money from loan which i had taken from HDFC before ITA (i was not expecting ITA)
The loan was taken on 12th Dec and ITA was 19th December. Having said that the POF letter which i had mentioned cumulative amount including 4,50,000.
I also missed giving an LOE to IRCC not to consider 4,50,000 at time of AOR
What i had thought at time of submitting AOR is that immigration officer will consider (16,75,000 - 4,50,000)
12,25,000 and this is above threshold required for family of 2.
The question which is bothering is- How do i explain this transaction?
Also, i have repaid this 4,50,000 and also have an NOC letter issued from Bank on 1st April 2019 but that is 4 months after AOR
I think it was a silly mistake from my end (missing LOE) and i am applying on my own.
I understood from online sources that procedural fairness is just a step before rejection and am finding myself in troubled waters. Can anybody help?
What should i do in this case to explain 4,50,000 - Basically requesting officer not to consider this transaction
Any large transactions generally raise a red flag and in your case there were many in a matter of days. Having said that, there is nothing much to worry about. You just have to tell the truth. And, your explanation is good enough.Hello Everyone,
I need one help. I have received yesterday Procedural Fairness Letter from CIC pertaining to POF
As part of POF document i had submitted a letter stating the actual funds (about INR 16,75,000 from HDFC Bank) of my Savings Account Plus 6 Months Bank statement
The case officer is concerned about a set of transactions - Which were credited to my account (listed below)
and have asked for explanation on the Source of funds via these transactions.
100,000 INR on December 1st 2018
75,000 INR on December 11th 2018
67,000 INR on December 11th 2018
4,50,000 INR on December 12th 2018
2,00,000 INR on December 12th 2018
1,50,450 INR on December 13th 2018
I have explanation of all of these transaction (These funds are from my own accounts from different banks and primary reason was to consolidate all money in single account. I have obtained necessary proofs)
However i don't know how to explain the below one: (It is significant amount)
4,50,000 INR on December 12th 2018
This is money from loan which i had taken from HDFC before ITA (i was not expecting ITA)
The loan was taken on 12th Dec and ITA was 19th December. Having said that the POF letter which i had mentioned cumulative amount including 4,50,000.
I also missed giving an LOE to IRCC not to consider 4,50,000 at time of AOR
What i had thought at time of submitting AOR is that immigration officer will consider (16,75,000 - 4,50,000)
12,25,000 and this is above threshold required for family of 2.
The question which is bothering is- How do i explain this transaction?
Also, i have repaid this 4,50,000 and also have an NOC letter issued from Bank on 1st April 2019 but that is 4 months after AOR
I think it was a silly mistake from my end (missing LOE) and i am applying on my own.
I understood from online sources that procedural fairness is just a step before rejection and am finding myself in troubled waters. Can anybody help?
What should i do in this case to explain 4,50,000 - Basically requesting officer not to consider this transaction
It is difficult to say whether this conversation actually took place or someone is writing a story. But lets assume this did happen.Quoting Mimiiaz from https://forum.immigrer.com/topic/155901-délai-de-traitement-entrée-express-2018/page/209/#comments
It's about current trends in processsing times.
Quote published today 12 hours ago:
"Bonjour à tous,
Félicitations à tous ceux qui ont eu le PPR ces derniers temps.
Je suis installée à Toronto depuis 2 mois et demi et j'ai rencontré une agent qui travaille au service de l'immigration pour la délivrance des RP mais elle s'occupe uniquement des demande de personne déjà présente sur le territoire. Je lui ai parlé un peu du désarroi des francophones de ce forum par rapport au traitement et au temps d'attente et malheureusement elle n'était pas vraiment choqué....
Apparemment malgré le nombre de demande qui augmente aucun fond n'est prévu pour augmenter les effectifs du personnel... Il y en a même plusieurs qui font des burn out et ne viennent plus travailler... Il semblerait que les fonds soient allouer en priorité aux réfugiés ce qui entraine nos candidatures en bas de la liste des priorités de traitement...
En gros 1) réfugiés 2) demande de RP depuis le Canada (des personnes qui ont un autre type de visa mais qui habitent déjà au Canada), 3) demande de RP depuis l'étranger.
Je ne veux pas décourager ceux qui commencent la procédure et même si je sais que beaucoup d'entre vous ont remarqué que le délais ne faisait que se rallonger, ce n'est malheureusement pas prêt de s'améliorer...
Je vous souhaite en tout cas bon courage à tous ceux qui sont dans l'attente et oui pour les nouveaux soyez prêt à attendre et profitez de votre famille, vos amis et ménagez vous car croyez moi malgré tout ce que vous pouvez ressentir comme stress dans l'attente, ce n'est rien face au changement de vie qui vous attend sur place ! "
Lazy translation copied/pasted from google translate:
"Hello everyone,
Congratulations to everyone who has had the RPP lately.
I have been living in Toronto for the last two and a half months and I have met with an immigration officer who works for the issuance of PR, but only deals with applications from people already in the territory. I talked to her a bit of disarray francophones in this forum with respect to processing and waiting times and unfortunately she was not really shocked ....
Apparently despite the number of requests that increase no funds are expected to increase staff numbers ... There are even many who burn out and do not come to work anymore ... It seems that funds are allocated in priority to refugees resulting in our applications at the bottom of the list of processing priorities ...
Roughly 1) Refugees 2) PR application from Canada (people who have a different type of visa but who already live in Canada), 3) PR application from abroad.
I do not want to discourage those who start the process and although I know that many of you have noticed that the delay is only getting longer, it is unfortunately not ready to improve ...
I wish you anyway good luck to all who are waiting for new and yes be prepared to wait and enjoy your family, friends and Pace because you believe me despite what you may experience as stress the wait is nothing to change the life that awaits you on the spot!"
I think even IRCC has got no idea about that I think it is more random than we would want to believe. I'm more convinced that there is more madness than method in the way they work. But again priority for Canadian government would be its citizens and hence budgets would not be allocated to make IRCC more efficient.I haven't got any clear idea about how IRCC works exactly.
Thank u so much..Ohhhh... I just received this one only today and nothing changed inside my application..all the entities are same as before and application is still in IP1.. however, as per my call to cic about three weeks ago, only security was pending. So, I guess this update might be related to the completion of security, I am not sure though.
I think I must not get my hopes high until I receive anything... anyways Congratulations for your PPR..I wish you good luck for your future endeavors..
Means someone is working on your application and it is progressing. Hopefully, means PPR is nearer than before.Hi guys quick question - I just logged into my account and it said for the second time within one day “Application/profile updated”. Any thoughts?